[flang] Use more generic overload for Operation in Traverse #133305
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently there are two specific overloads: for unary operations, i.e.
Operation<D, R, O>
, and binary onesOperation<D, R, LO, RO>
.This makes it impossible for a derived class to use a single overload to handle all types of operations:
Operation<D, R, O...>
. Since the base overloads need to be included in the derived class's scope, viausing Base::operator()
either one of the specific overloads will always be a better candidate than the more generic derived one.This patch replaces the two specific overloads for Operation in Traverse with a single generic overload, while preserving the existing functionality, and allowing derived classes to use a single overload as well.