Skip to content

[CI] Exclude gn changes from running premerge #133623

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

boomanaiden154
Copy link
Contributor

These changes are mostly pushed by the gnsyncbot directly to main and thus don't go through a PR, but we still test on main to see if main is broken. Given these touch llvm/, they end up burning a decent amount of testing time for no real benefit, so I think it makes sense to exclude them from premerge testing explicitly.

These changes are mostly pushed by the gnsyncbot directly to main and
thus don't go through a PR, but we still test on main to see if main is
broken. Given these touch llvm/, they end up burning a decent amount of
testing time for no real benefit, so I think it makes sense to exclude
them from premerge testing explicitly.
Copy link
Contributor

@Keenuts Keenuts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for the script change.

@boomanaiden154 boomanaiden154 merged commit ce296f1 into llvm:main Apr 1, 2025
10 checks passed
@boomanaiden154 boomanaiden154 deleted the compute-projects-exclude-gn-changes branch April 1, 2025 19:58
Ankur-0429 pushed a commit to Ankur-0429/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
These changes are mostly pushed by the gnsyncbot directly to main and
thus don't go through a PR, but we still test on main to see if main is
broken. Given these touch llvm/, they end up burning a decent amount of
testing time for no real benefit, so I think it makes sense to exclude
them from premerge testing explicitly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants