[clang-format] Fix a bug in annotating braces #134039
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format Author: Owen Pan (owenca) ChangesFix #133873 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134039.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
index f7712bea01c2c..213b706807b2a 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -1887,8 +1887,11 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement(
if (FormatTok->isBinaryOperator())
nextToken();
break;
- case tok::caret:
+ case tok::caret: {
+ const auto *Prev = FormatTok->getPreviousNonComment();
nextToken();
+ if (Prev && Prev->is(tok::identifier))
+ break;
// Block return type.
if (FormatTok->Tok.isAnyIdentifier() || FormatTok->isTypeName(LangOpts)) {
nextToken();
@@ -1903,6 +1906,7 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement(
if (FormatTok->is(tok::l_brace))
parseChildBlock();
break;
+ }
case tok::l_brace:
if (InRequiresExpression)
FormatTok->setFinalizedType(TT_BracedListLBrace);
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index af9fd574b068c..7e0af1c7b4c36 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -3622,6 +3622,11 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, BraceKind) {
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
EXPECT_BRACE_KIND(Tokens[7], BK_BracedInit);
EXPECT_BRACE_KIND(Tokens[9], BK_BracedInit);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("return lhs ^ Byte{rhs};");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 9u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_BRACE_KIND(Tokens[4], BK_BracedInit);
+ EXPECT_BRACE_KIND(Tokens[6], BK_BracedInit);
}
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsElaboratedTypeSpecifier) {
|
HazardyKnusperkeks
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2025
mydeveloperday
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2025
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/7879 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #133873