Skip to content

[LoopUnroll] UnrollRuntimeMultiExit takes precedence over TTI. #134259

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
26 changes: 14 additions & 12 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollRuntime.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -465,10 +465,6 @@ static bool canProfitablyRuntimeUnrollMultiExitLoop(
Loop *L, SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *> &OtherExits, BasicBlock *LatchExit,
bool UseEpilogRemainder) {

// Priority goes to UnrollRuntimeMultiExit if it's supplied.
if (UnrollRuntimeMultiExit.getNumOccurrences())
return UnrollRuntimeMultiExit;

// The main pain point with multi-exit loop unrolling is that once unrolled,
// we will not be able to merge all blocks into a straight line code.
// There are branches within the unrolled loop that go to the OtherExits.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -633,14 +629,20 @@ bool llvm::UnrollRuntimeLoopRemainder(
if (!PreserveLCSSA)
return false;

if (!RuntimeUnrollMultiExit &&
!canProfitablyRuntimeUnrollMultiExitLoop(L, OtherExits, LatchExit,
UseEpilogRemainder)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(
dbgs()
<< "Multiple exit/exiting blocks in loop and multi-exit unrolling not "
"enabled!\n");
return false;
// Priority goes to UnrollRuntimeMultiExit if it's supplied.
if (UnrollRuntimeMultiExit.getNumOccurrences()) {
if (!UnrollRuntimeMultiExit)
return false;
} else {
// Otherwise perform multi-exit unrolling, if either the target indicates
// it is profitable or the general profitability heuristics apply.
if (!RuntimeUnrollMultiExit &&
!canProfitablyRuntimeUnrollMultiExitLoop(L, OtherExits, LatchExit,
UseEpilogRemainder)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Multiple exit/exiting blocks in loop and "
"multi-exit unrolling not enabled!\n");
return false;
}
}
}
// Use Scalar Evolution to compute the trip count. This allows more loops to
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
; RUN: opt -p loop-unroll -mcpu=apple-m2 -S %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=APPLE %s
; RUN: opt -p loop-unroll -mcpu=apple-m3 -S %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=APPLE %s
; RUN: opt -p loop-unroll -mcpu=apple-m4 -S %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=APPLE %s
; RUN: opt -p loop-unroll -mcpu=apple-m1 -unroll-runtime-multi-exit=false -S %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=OTHER %s
; RUN: opt -p loop-unroll -mcpu=cortex-a57 -S %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=OTHER %s

target datalayout = "e-m:o-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128-Fn32"
Expand Down