Skip to content

[libc++][NFC] Remove a few aliases in __tree #134392

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2025

Conversation

philnik777
Copy link
Contributor

These aliases aren't required anymore, since we've taken an ABI break unconditionally which these were used to avoid.

@philnik777
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Michael137 Could you maybe take a look at the LLDB failures?

@Michael137
Copy link
Member

these are caused by a recent clang change (which i think was reverted in cbba960)

@philnik777
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Michael137 Ah, thanks! I'll try to rebase.

@philnik777 philnik777 marked this pull request as ready for review April 12, 2025 20:38
@philnik777 philnik777 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 12, 2025 20:38
@philnik777 philnik777 merged commit 5bdad05 into llvm:main Apr 12, 2025
83 of 84 checks passed
@llvmbot llvmbot added the libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. label Apr 12, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Apr 12, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx

Author: Nikolas Klauser (philnik777)

Changes

These aliases aren't required anymore, since we've taken an ABI break unconditionally which these were used to avoid.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134392.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) libcxx/include/__tree (+50-60)
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__tree b/libcxx/include/__tree
index e84bc4ffda0bd..247a5acfb1489 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__tree
+++ b/libcxx/include/__tree
@@ -594,8 +594,6 @@ template <class _NodePtr, class _Tp, class _VoidPtr>
 struct __tree_node_types<_NodePtr, __tree_node<_Tp, _VoidPtr> >
     : public __tree_node_base_types<_VoidPtr>, __tree_key_value_types<_Tp>, __tree_map_pointer_types<_Tp, _VoidPtr> {
   typedef __tree_node_base_types<_VoidPtr> __base;
-  typedef __tree_key_value_types<_Tp> __key_base;
-  typedef __tree_map_pointer_types<_Tp, _VoidPtr> __map_pointer_base;
 
 public:
   typedef typename pointer_traits<_NodePtr>::element_type __node_type;
@@ -604,7 +602,6 @@ public:
   typedef _Tp __node_value_type;
   typedef __rebind_pointer_t<_VoidPtr, __node_value_type> __node_value_type_pointer;
   typedef __rebind_pointer_t<_VoidPtr, const __node_value_type> __const_node_value_type_pointer;
-  typedef typename __base::__end_node_pointer __iter_pointer;
 
 private:
   static_assert(!is_const<__node_type>::value, "_NodePtr should never be a pointer to const");
@@ -712,10 +709,9 @@ class __tree_iterator {
   typedef _NodePtr __node_pointer;
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__node_base_pointer __node_base_pointer;
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__end_node_pointer __end_node_pointer;
-  typedef typename _NodeTypes::__iter_pointer __iter_pointer;
   typedef pointer_traits<__node_pointer> __pointer_traits;
 
-  __iter_pointer __ptr_;
+  __end_node_pointer __ptr_;
 
 public:
   typedef bidirectional_iterator_tag iterator_category;
@@ -735,8 +731,7 @@ public:
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pointer operator->() const { return pointer_traits<pointer>::pointer_to(__get_np()->__value_); }
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_iterator& operator++() {
-    __ptr_ = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(
-        std::__tree_next_iter<__end_node_pointer>(static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__ptr_)));
+    __ptr_ = std::__tree_next_iter<__end_node_pointer>(static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__ptr_));
     return *this;
   }
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_iterator operator++(int) {
@@ -746,8 +741,7 @@ public:
   }
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_iterator& operator--() {
-    __ptr_ = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(
-        std::__tree_prev_iter<__node_base_pointer>(static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__ptr_)));
+    __ptr_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(std::__tree_prev_iter<__node_base_pointer>(__ptr_));
     return *this;
   }
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_iterator operator--(int) {
@@ -789,10 +783,9 @@ class __tree_const_iterator {
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__node_pointer __node_pointer;
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__node_base_pointer __node_base_pointer;
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__end_node_pointer __end_node_pointer;
-  typedef typename _NodeTypes::__iter_pointer __iter_pointer;
   typedef pointer_traits<__node_pointer> __pointer_traits;
 
-  __iter_pointer __ptr_;
+  __end_node_pointer __ptr_;
 
 public:
   typedef bidirectional_iterator_tag iterator_category;
@@ -818,8 +811,7 @@ public:
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pointer operator->() const { return pointer_traits<pointer>::pointer_to(__get_np()->__value_); }
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_const_iterator& operator++() {
-    __ptr_ = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(
-        std::__tree_next_iter<__end_node_pointer>(static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__ptr_)));
+    __ptr_ = std::__tree_next_iter<__end_node_pointer>(static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__ptr_));
     return *this;
   }
 
@@ -830,8 +822,7 @@ public:
   }
 
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __tree_const_iterator& operator--() {
-    __ptr_ = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(
-        std::__tree_prev_iter<__node_base_pointer>(static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__ptr_)));
+    __ptr_ = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(std::__tree_prev_iter<__node_base_pointer>(__ptr_));
     return *this;
   }
 
@@ -906,9 +897,9 @@ public:
 
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__end_node_type __end_node_t;
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__end_node_pointer __end_node_ptr;
+  using __end_node_pointer _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = typename _NodeTypes::__end_node_pointer;
 
   typedef typename _NodeTypes::__parent_pointer __parent_pointer;
-  typedef typename _NodeTypes::__iter_pointer __iter_pointer;
 
   typedef __rebind_alloc<__alloc_traits, __node> __node_allocator;
   typedef allocator_traits<__node_allocator> __node_traits;
@@ -925,24 +916,23 @@ private:
                 "Allocator does not rebind pointers in a sane manner.");
 
 private:
-  __iter_pointer __begin_node_;
+  __end_node_pointer __begin_node_;
   _LIBCPP_COMPRESSED_PAIR(__end_node_t, __end_node_, __node_allocator, __node_alloc_);
   _LIBCPP_COMPRESSED_PAIR(size_type, __size_, value_compare, __value_comp_);
 
 public:
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __iter_pointer __end_node() _NOEXCEPT {
-    return static_cast<__iter_pointer>(pointer_traits<__end_node_ptr>::pointer_to(__end_node_));
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __end_node_pointer __end_node() _NOEXCEPT {
+    return pointer_traits<__end_node_pointer>::pointer_to(__end_node_);
   }
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __iter_pointer __end_node() const _NOEXCEPT {
-    return static_cast<__iter_pointer>(
-        pointer_traits<__end_node_ptr>::pointer_to(const_cast<__end_node_t&>(__end_node_)));
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __end_node_pointer __end_node() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return pointer_traits<__end_node_pointer>::pointer_to(const_cast<__end_node_t&>(__end_node_));
   }
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __node_allocator& __node_alloc() _NOEXCEPT { return __node_alloc_; }
 
 private:
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const __node_allocator& __node_alloc() const _NOEXCEPT { return __node_alloc_; }
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __iter_pointer& __begin_node() _NOEXCEPT { return __begin_node_; }
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const __iter_pointer& __begin_node() const _NOEXCEPT { return __begin_node_; }
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __end_node_pointer& __begin_node() _NOEXCEPT { return __begin_node_; }
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const __end_node_pointer& __begin_node() const _NOEXCEPT { return __begin_node_; }
 
 public:
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI allocator_type __alloc() const _NOEXCEPT { return allocator_type(__node_alloc()); }
@@ -1189,27 +1179,27 @@ public:
     return __lower_bound(__v, __root(), __end_node());
   }
   template <class _Key>
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI iterator __lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result);
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI iterator __lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result);
   template <class _Key>
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_iterator lower_bound(const _Key& __v) const {
     return __lower_bound(__v, __root(), __end_node());
   }
   template <class _Key>
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_iterator
-  __lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result) const;
+  __lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result) const;
   template <class _Key>
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI iterator upper_bound(const _Key& __v) {
     return __upper_bound(__v, __root(), __end_node());
   }
   template <class _Key>
-  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI iterator __upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result);
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI iterator __upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result);
   template <class _Key>
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_iterator upper_bound(const _Key& __v) const {
     return __upper_bound(__v, __root(), __end_node());
   }
   template <class _Key>
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_iterator
-  __upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result) const;
+  __upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result) const;
   template <class _Key>
   _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pair<iterator, iterator> __equal_range_unique(const _Key& __k);
   template <class _Key>
@@ -1323,13 +1313,13 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__tree(const value_compare& __comp) _NOEXCEPT
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__tree(const allocator_type& __a)
-    : __begin_node_(__iter_pointer()), __node_alloc_(__node_allocator(__a)), __size_(0) {
+    : __begin_node_(), __node_alloc_(__node_allocator(__a)), __size_(0) {
   __begin_node() = __end_node();
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__tree(const value_compare& __comp, const allocator_type& __a)
-    : __begin_node_(__iter_pointer()), __node_alloc_(__node_allocator(__a)), __size_(0), __value_comp_(__comp) {
+    : __begin_node_(), __node_alloc_(__node_allocator(__a)), __size_(0), __value_comp_(__comp) {
   __begin_node() = __end_node();
 }
 
@@ -1427,7 +1417,7 @@ void __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__assign_multi(_InputIterator __first, _
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__tree(const __tree& __t)
-    : __begin_node_(__iter_pointer()),
+    : __begin_node_(),
       __node_alloc_(__node_traits::select_on_container_copy_construction(__t.__node_alloc())),
       __size_(0),
       __value_comp_(__t.value_comp()) {
@@ -1758,7 +1748,7 @@ void __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__insert_node_at(
   // __new_node->__is_black_ is initialized in __tree_balance_after_insert
   __child = __new_node;
   if (__begin_node()->__left_ != nullptr)
-    __begin_node() = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__begin_node()->__left_);
+    __begin_node() = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__begin_node()->__left_);
   std::__tree_balance_after_insert(__end_node()->__left_, __child);
   ++size();
 }
@@ -2110,17 +2100,17 @@ template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 template <class _Key>
 typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::size_type
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__count_multi(const _Key& __k) const {
-  __iter_pointer __result = __end_node();
-  __node_pointer __rt     = __root();
+  __end_node_pointer __result = __end_node();
+  __node_pointer __rt         = __root();
   while (__rt != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__k, __rt->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt);
       __rt     = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_);
     } else if (value_comp()(__rt->__value_, __k))
       __rt = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_);
     else
       return std::distance(
-          __lower_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_), static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt)),
+          __lower_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_), static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt)),
           __upper_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_), __result));
   }
   return 0;
@@ -2129,10 +2119,10 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__count_multi(const _Key& __k) const {
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 template <class _Key>
 typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::iterator
-__tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result) {
+__tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result) {
   while (__root != nullptr) {
     if (!value_comp()(__root->__value_, __v)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__root);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__root);
       __root   = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__left_);
     } else
       __root = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__right_);
@@ -2143,10 +2133,10 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__lower_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 template <class _Key>
 typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__lower_bound(
-    const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result) const {
+    const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result) const {
   while (__root != nullptr) {
     if (!value_comp()(__root->__value_, __v)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__root);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__root);
       __root   = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__left_);
     } else
       __root = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__right_);
@@ -2157,10 +2147,10 @@ typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator __tree<_Tp, _Compare,
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 template <class _Key>
 typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::iterator
-__tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result) {
+__tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result) {
   while (__root != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__v, __root->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__root);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__root);
       __root   = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__left_);
     } else
       __root = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__right_);
@@ -2171,10 +2161,10 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__upper_bound(const _Key& __v, __node_pointer
 template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
 template <class _Key>
 typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__upper_bound(
-    const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __iter_pointer __result) const {
+    const _Key& __v, __node_pointer __root, __end_node_pointer __result) const {
   while (__root != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__v, __root->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__root);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__root);
       __root   = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__left_);
     } else
       __root = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__root->__right_);
@@ -2187,17 +2177,17 @@ template <class _Key>
 pair<typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::iterator, typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::iterator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__equal_range_unique(const _Key& __k) {
   typedef pair<iterator, iterator> _Pp;
-  __iter_pointer __result = __end_node();
-  __node_pointer __rt     = __root();
+  __end_node_pointer __result = __end_node();
+  __node_pointer __rt         = __root();
   while (__rt != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__k, __rt->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt);
       __rt     = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_);
     } else if (value_comp()(__rt->__value_, __k))
       __rt = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_);
     else
       return _Pp(iterator(__rt),
-                 iterator(__rt->__right_ != nullptr ? static_cast<__iter_pointer>(std::__tree_min(__rt->__right_))
+                 iterator(__rt->__right_ != nullptr ? static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(std::__tree_min(__rt->__right_))
                                                     : __result));
   }
   return _Pp(iterator(__result), iterator(__result));
@@ -2209,11 +2199,11 @@ pair<typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator,
      typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__equal_range_unique(const _Key& __k) const {
   typedef pair<const_iterator, const_iterator> _Pp;
-  __iter_pointer __result = __end_node();
-  __node_pointer __rt     = __root();
+  __end_node_pointer __result = __end_node();
+  __node_pointer __rt         = __root();
   while (__rt != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__k, __rt->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt);
       __rt     = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_);
     } else if (value_comp()(__rt->__value_, __k))
       __rt = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_);
@@ -2221,7 +2211,7 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__equal_range_unique(const _Key& __k) const {
       return _Pp(
           const_iterator(__rt),
           const_iterator(
-              __rt->__right_ != nullptr ? static_cast<__iter_pointer>(std::__tree_min(__rt->__right_)) : __result));
+              __rt->__right_ != nullptr ? static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(std::__tree_min(__rt->__right_)) : __result));
   }
   return _Pp(const_iterator(__result), const_iterator(__result));
 }
@@ -2231,16 +2221,16 @@ template <class _Key>
 pair<typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::iterator, typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::iterator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__equal_range_multi(const _Key& __k) {
   typedef pair<iterator, iterator> _Pp;
-  __iter_pointer __result = __end_node();
+  __end_node_pointer __result = __end_node();
   __node_pointer __rt     = __root();
   while (__rt != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__k, __rt->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt);
       __rt     = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_);
     } else if (value_comp()(__rt->__value_, __k))
       __rt = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_);
     else
-      return _Pp(__lower_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_), static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt)),
+      return _Pp(__lower_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_), static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt)),
                  __upper_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_), __result));
   }
   return _Pp(iterator(__result), iterator(__result));
@@ -2252,16 +2242,16 @@ pair<typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator,
      typename __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::const_iterator>
 __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::__equal_range_multi(const _Key& __k) const {
   typedef pair<const_iterator, const_iterator> _Pp;
-  __iter_pointer __result = __end_node();
+  __end_node_pointer __result = __end_node();
   __node_pointer __rt     = __root();
   while (__rt != nullptr) {
     if (value_comp()(__k, __rt->__value_)) {
-      __result = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt);
+      __result = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt);
       __rt     = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_);
     } else if (value_comp()(__rt->__value_, __k))
       __rt = static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_);
     else
-      return _Pp(__lower_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_), static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__rt)),
+      return _Pp(__lower_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__left_), static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__rt)),
                  __upper_bound(__k, static_cast<__node_pointer>(__rt->__right_), __result));
   }
   return _Pp(const_iterator(__result), const_iterator(__result));
@@ -2273,9 +2263,9 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::remove(const_iterator __p) _NOEXCEPT {
   __node_pointer __np = __p.__get_np();
   if (__begin_node() == __p.__ptr_) {
     if (__np->__right_ != nullptr)
-      __begin_node() = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__np->__right_);
+      __begin_node() = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__np->__right_);
     else
-      __begin_node() = static_cast<__iter_pointer>(__np->__parent_);
+      __begin_node() = static_cast<__end_node_pointer>(__np->__parent_);
   }
   --size();
   std::__tree_remove(__end_node()->__left_, static_cast<__node_base_pointer>(__np));

@llvm-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

llvm-ci commented Apr 12, 2025

LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast running on sanitizer-buildbot4 while building libcxx at step 2 "annotate".

Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/10401

Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
Step 2 (annotate) failure: 'python ../sanitizer_buildbot/sanitizers/zorg/buildbot/builders/sanitizers/buildbot_selector.py' (failure)
...
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using lld-link: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/lld-link
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using ld64.lld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/ld64.lld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using wasm-ld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/wasm-ld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using ld.lld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/ld.lld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using lld-link: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/lld-link
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using ld64.lld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/ld64.lld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using wasm-ld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/wasm-ld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/main.py:72: note: The test suite configuration requested an individual test timeout of 0 seconds but a timeout of 900 seconds was requested on the command line. Forcing timeout to be 900 seconds.
-- Testing: 90177 tests, 88 workers --
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60
FAIL: Clang :: Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp (12790 of 90177)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
cat /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp | /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/clang-repl -Xcc -fno-rtti -Xcc -fno-sized-deallocation      | /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp # RUN: at line 6
+ /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/clang-repl -Xcc -fno-rtti -Xcc -fno-sized-deallocation
+ /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp
+ cat /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp
JIT session error: In graph incr_module_23-jitted-objectbuffer, section .text.startup: relocation target "_ZN1AD2Ev" at address 0x79e66309f040 is out of range of Delta32 fixup at 0x75e66200d02d (<anonymous block> @ 0x75e66200d010 + 0x1d)
error: Failed to materialize symbols: { (main, { a2, $.incr_module_23.__inits.0, __orc_init_func.incr_module_23 }) }
error: Failed to materialize symbols: { (main, { __orc_init_func.incr_module_23 }) }
/home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp:26:11: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
// CHECK: ~A(2)
          ^
<stdin>:1:262: note: scanning from here
clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> ~A(1)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ^

Input file: <stdin>
Check file: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
          1: clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> ~A(1) 
check:26                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          X error: no match found
          2: clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl>  
check:26     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. 
Slowest Tests:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step 10 (stage2/asan_ubsan check) failure: stage2/asan_ubsan check (failure)
...
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using lld-link: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/lld-link
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using ld64.lld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/ld64.lld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using wasm-ld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/wasm-ld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using ld.lld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/ld.lld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using lld-link: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/lld-link
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using ld64.lld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/ld64.lld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:520: note: using wasm-ld: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/wasm-ld
llvm-lit: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/main.py:72: note: The test suite configuration requested an individual test timeout of 0 seconds but a timeout of 900 seconds was requested on the command line. Forcing timeout to be 900 seconds.
-- Testing: 90177 tests, 88 workers --
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60
FAIL: Clang :: Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp (12790 of 90177)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
cat /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp | /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/clang-repl -Xcc -fno-rtti -Xcc -fno-sized-deallocation      | /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp # RUN: at line 6
+ /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/clang-repl -Xcc -fno-rtti -Xcc -fno-sized-deallocation
+ /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp
+ cat /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp
JIT session error: In graph incr_module_23-jitted-objectbuffer, section .text.startup: relocation target "_ZN1AD2Ev" at address 0x79e66309f040 is out of range of Delta32 fixup at 0x75e66200d02d (<anonymous block> @ 0x75e66200d010 + 0x1d)
error: Failed to materialize symbols: { (main, { a2, $.incr_module_23.__inits.0, __orc_init_func.incr_module_23 }) }
error: Failed to materialize symbols: { (main, { __orc_init_func.incr_module_23 }) }
/home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp:26:11: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
// CHECK: ~A(2)
          ^
<stdin>:1:262: note: scanning from here
clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> ~A(1)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ^

Input file: <stdin>
Check file: /home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Interpreter/inline-virtual.cpp

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
          1: clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl... clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> ~A(1) 
check:26                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          X error: no match found
          2: clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl>  
check:26     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. 
Slowest Tests:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

var-const pushed a commit to ldionne/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
These aliases aren't required anymore, since we've taken an ABI break
unconditionally which these were used to avoid.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants