Skip to content

[libc] Fixed typo in porting.rst #134488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

amansharma612
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2025

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot llvmbot added the libc label Apr 5, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Apr 5, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-libc

Author: None (amansharma612)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134488.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) libc/docs/porting.rst (+1-1)
diff --git a/libc/docs/porting.rst b/libc/docs/porting.rst
index 5747a8b9b0c73..e890e439f619f 100644
--- a/libc/docs/porting.rst
+++ b/libc/docs/porting.rst
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ architectures. Since a large part of the libc makes use of syscalls (or an
 equivalent on non-Linux like platforms), it might be simpler and convenient to
 bring up the libc for one architecture at a time. In such cases, wherein the
 support surface of LLVM's libc differs for each target architecture, one will
-have to add a subdirectory (within the config directory os the operating
+have to add a subdirectory (within the config directory of the operating
 system) for each target architecture, and list the relevant config information
 separately in those subdirectories. For example, for Linux, the x86_64 and
 aarch64 configs are in separate directories, named

@lntue lntue changed the title Fixed typo in porting.rst [libc] Fixed typo in porting.rst Apr 6, 2025
@MacDue MacDue merged commit 3382aef into llvm:main Apr 7, 2025
18 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

@amansharma612 Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

qiaojbao pushed a commit to GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
Local branch origin/amd-gfx 1058b08 Merged main:922260722795 into origin/amd-gfx:cd0a74afd177
Remote branch main 3382aef [libc] Fixed typo in porting.rst (llvm#134488)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants