-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
Reland "[lldb] Clear thread-creation breakpoints in ProcessGDBRemote::Clear (#134397)" #135296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reland "[lldb] Clear thread-creation breakpoints in ProcessGDBRemote::Clear (#134397)" #135296
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan (felipepiovezan) ChangesThis reapplies commit 232525f. The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when Target was destroyed. In Target::Destroy, We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135296.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.cpp
index 68360788c96e6..b616e99be83b2 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.cpp
@@ -2571,9 +2571,18 @@ Status ProcessGDBRemote::DoDestroy() {
StopAsyncThread();
KillDebugserverProcess();
+ RemoveNewThreadBreakpoints();
return Status();
}
+void ProcessGDBRemote::RemoveNewThreadBreakpoints() {
+ if (m_thread_create_bp_sp) {
+ if (TargetSP target_sp = m_target_wp.lock())
+ target_sp->RemoveBreakpointByID(m_thread_create_bp_sp->GetID());
+ m_thread_create_bp_sp.reset();
+ }
+}
+
void ProcessGDBRemote::SetLastStopPacket(
const StringExtractorGDBRemote &response) {
const bool did_exec =
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.h b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.h
index 1cbd1e82b381d..20d7fc0801eb3 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.h
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.h
@@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ class ProcessGDBRemote : public Process,
lldb::user_id_t break_id,
lldb::user_id_t break_loc_id);
+ /// Remove the breakpoints associated with thread creation from the Target.
+ void RemoveNewThreadBreakpoints();
+
// ContinueDelegate interface
void HandleAsyncStdout(llvm::StringRef out) override;
void HandleAsyncMisc(llvm::StringRef data) override;
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/macosx/thread_start_bps/TestBreakpointsThreadInit.py b/lldb/test/API/macosx/thread_start_bps/TestBreakpointsThreadInit.py
index 1c6fd4f91c73e..bf667f6f7d336 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/macosx/thread_start_bps/TestBreakpointsThreadInit.py
+++ b/lldb/test/API/macosx/thread_start_bps/TestBreakpointsThreadInit.py
@@ -35,3 +35,23 @@ def test_internal_bps_resolved(self):
for bp in bps:
num_resolved += bp.GetNumResolvedLocations()
self.assertGreater(num_resolved, 0)
+
+ @skipUnlessDarwin
+ def test_internal_bps_deleted_on_relaunch(self):
+ self.build()
+
+ source_file = lldb.SBFileSpec("main.c")
+ target, process, thread, bkpt = lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
+ self, "initial hello", source_file
+ )
+
+ self.runCmd("break list --internal")
+ output = self.res.GetOutput()
+ self.assertEqual(output.count("thread-creation"), 1)
+
+ process.Kill()
+ self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
+
+ self.runCmd("break list --internal")
+ output = self.res.GetOutput()
+ self.assertEqual(output.count("thread-creation"), 1)
|
…:Clear (llvm#134397)" This reapplies commit 232525f. The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when `Target` was destroyed. In `Target::Destroy`, `DeleteCurrentProcess` was called, but it did not destroy the thread creation breakpoints for the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` because `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear` was not called in that path. `Target `then proceeded to destroy its breakpoints, which resulted in a call to the destructor of a `std::vector` containing the breakpoints. Through a sequence of complicated events, destroying breakpoints caused the reference count of the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` to finally reach zero. This, in turn, called `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear`, which attempted to destroy the breakpoints. To do that, it would go back into the Target's vector of breakpoints, which we are in the middle of destroying. We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into `Process:DoDestroy`, which is a virtual Process method that will be called much earlier.
ae63d5b
to
b24dc5d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice debugging on this one, it can be a little unclear of the intended jobs for each of the reset/clear/terminate methods. I definitely didn't remember them. This looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that is a more appropriate place to do that work.
…:Clear (llvm#134397)" (llvm#135296) This reapplies commit llvm@232525f. The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when `Target` was destroyed. In `Target::Destroy`, `DeleteCurrentProcess` was called, but it did not destroy the thread creation breakpoints for the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` because `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear` was not called in that path. `Target `then proceeded to destroy its breakpoints, which resulted in a call to the destructor of a `std::vector` containing the breakpoints. Through a sequence of complicated events, destroying breakpoints caused the reference count of the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` to finally reach zero. This, in turn, called `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear`, which attempted to destroy the breakpoints. To do that, it would go back into the Target's vector of breakpoints, which we are in the middle of destroying. We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into `Process:DoDestroy`, which is a virtual Process method that will be called much earlier. (cherry picked from commit c2939b9)
…:Clear (llvm#134397)" (llvm#135296) This reapplies commit llvm@232525f. The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when `Target` was destroyed. In `Target::Destroy`, `DeleteCurrentProcess` was called, but it did not destroy the thread creation breakpoints for the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` because `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear` was not called in that path. `Target `then proceeded to destroy its breakpoints, which resulted in a call to the destructor of a `std::vector` containing the breakpoints. Through a sequence of complicated events, destroying breakpoints caused the reference count of the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` to finally reach zero. This, in turn, called `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear`, which attempted to destroy the breakpoints. To do that, it would go back into the Target's vector of breakpoints, which we are in the middle of destroying. We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into `Process:DoDestroy`, which is a virtual Process method that will be called much earlier.
This reapplies commit 232525f.
The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when
Target
wasdestroyed. In
Target::Destroy
,DeleteCurrentProcess
was called, butit did not destroy the thread creation breakpoints for the underlying
ProcessGDBRemote
becauseProcessGDBRemote::Clear
was not called inthat path.
Target
then proceeded to destroy its breakpoints, which resulted in acall to the destructor of a
std::vector
containing the breakpoints.Through a sequence of complicated events, destroying breakpoints caused
the reference count of the underlying
ProcessGDBRemote
to finallyreach zero. This, in turn, called
ProcessGDBRemote::Clear
, whichattempted to destroy the breakpoints. To do that, it would go back into
the Target's vector of breakpoints, which we are in the middle of
destroying.
We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into
Process:DoDestroy
, which is a virtual Process method that will becalled much earlier.