-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[X86] Fix the issue of creating index reg negations #135632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ | ||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 | ||
; RUN: llc %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown -mattr=+ndd -verify-machineinstrs --show-mc-encoding -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NDD | ||
|
||
|
||
define void @neg_8bit_1(i1 %cmp) { | ||
; NDD-LABEL: neg_8bit_1: | ||
; NDD: # %bb.0: # %entry | ||
; NDD-NEXT: andb $1, %dil, %al # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x7c,0x18,0x80,0xe7,0x01] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: movzbl 0, %ecx # encoding: [0x0f,0xb6,0x0c,0x25,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: negb %al, %al # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x7c,0x18,0xf6,0xd8] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: leab 2(%rcx,%rax), %al # encoding: [0x66,0x8d,0x44,0x01,0x02] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: movb %al, 0 # encoding: [0x88,0x04,0x25,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: retq # encoding: [0xc3] | ||
entry: | ||
%cond = select i1 %cmp, i8 1, i8 2 | ||
%0 = load i8, ptr null, align 4 | ||
%add = add i8 %cond, %0 | ||
store i8 %add, ptr null, align 4 | ||
ret void | ||
} | ||
|
||
define void @neg_8bit_2(i8 %int8) { | ||
; NDD-LABEL: neg_8bit_2: | ||
; NDD: # %bb.0: # %entry | ||
; NDD-NEXT: # kill: def $edi killed $edi def $rdi | ||
; NDD-NEXT: addb %dil, %dil, %al # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x7c,0x18,0x00,0xff] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: negb %al, %al # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x7c,0x18,0xf6,0xd8] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: leab 1(%rdi,%rax), %al # encoding: [0x66,0x8d,0x44,0x07,0x01] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: mulb %dil # encoding: [0x40,0xf6,0xe7] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: testb %al, %al # encoding: [0x84,0xc0] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: retq # encoding: [0xc3] | ||
entry: | ||
%0 = shl i8 %int8, 1 | ||
%sub = sub i8 %int8, %0 | ||
%add = add i8 %sub, 1 | ||
%div = mul i8 %add, %int8 | ||
%cmp = icmp slt i8 %div, 0 | ||
br i1 %cmp, label %label2, label %label1 | ||
|
||
label1: ; preds = %entry | ||
ret void | ||
|
||
label2: ; preds = %entry | ||
ret void | ||
} | ||
|
||
define i32 @neg_16bit(i16 %0) { | ||
; NDD-LABEL: neg_16bit: | ||
; NDD: # %bb.0: # %entry | ||
; NDD-NEXT: # kill: def $edi killed $edi def $rdi | ||
; NDD-NEXT: incw %di, %ax # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x7d,0x18,0xff,0xc7] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: addw $256, %di, %cx # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x75,0x18,0x81,0xc7,0x00,0x01] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: # imm = 0x100 | ||
; NDD-NEXT: testw %ax, %ax # encoding: [0x66,0x85,0xc0] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: cmovsl %ecx, %eax # EVEX TO LEGACY Compression encoding: [0x0f,0x48,0xc1] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: andw $-256, %ax # EVEX TO LEGACY Compression encoding: [0x66,0x25,0x00,0xff] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: negw %ax, %ax # encoding: [0x62,0xf4,0x7d,0x18,0xf7,0xd8] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: leaw 1(%rdi,%rax), %ax # encoding: [0x66,0x8d,0x44,0x07,0x01] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: movzwl %ax, %eax # encoding: [0x0f,0xb7,0xc0] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: movq %rax, 0 # encoding: [0x48,0x89,0x04,0x25,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: xorl %eax, %eax # encoding: [0x31,0xc0] | ||
; NDD-NEXT: retq # encoding: [0xc3] | ||
entry: | ||
%add = add i16 %0, 1 | ||
%rem = srem i16 %add, 256 | ||
%1 = zext i16 %rem to i19 | ||
%2 = sext i19 %1 to i64 | ||
%3 = getelementptr i8, ptr null, i64 %2 | ||
store ptr %3, ptr null, align 4 | ||
ret i32 0 | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it not compressed to non-NDD? same below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to clear the high bits of
rax
forlea
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it should be cleared by line 8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right. I think it's to prevent partial write then, see #132051
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@phoebewang , thank you for your explanation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with this patch. But it seems #132051 creates sub-optimal code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By sub-optimal, do you mean the code size? I think it's a general improvement considering the following sub has a dependency to the long lantency movzbl in the old code: https://godbolt.org/z/zexdsPnch