[docs] Fix the use of word "dependent" and other typos in the C++ Modules Doc

clang/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst

@@ -305,17 +305,17 @@ Therefore, none of the following names are valid by default:
 Using a reserved module name is strongly discouraged, but
 ``-Wno-reserved-module-identifier`` can be used to suppress the warning.
 
-Specifying dependent BMIs
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Specifying BMI dependencies
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-There are 3 ways to specify a dependent BMI:
+There are 3 ways to specify a BMI dependency:
 
 1. ``-fprebuilt-module-path=<path/to/directory>``.
 2. ``-fmodule-file=<path/to/BMI>`` (Deprecated).
 3. ``-fmodule-file=<module-name>=<path/to/BMI>``.
 
 The ``-fprebuilt-module-path`` option specifies the path to search for
-dependent BMIs. Multiple paths may be specified, similar to using ``-I`` to
+BMI dependencies. Multiple paths may be specified, similar to using ``-I`` to
 specify a search path for header files. When importing a module ``M``, the
 compiler looks for ``M.pcm`` in the directories specified by
 ``-fprebuilt-module-path``. Similarly, when importing a partition module unit
@@ -337,9 +337,8 @@ When these options are specified in the same invocation of the compiler, the
 ``-fmodule-file=<module-name>=<path/to/BMI>``, which takes precedence over
 ``-fprebuilt-module-path=<path/to/directory>``.
 
-Note: all dependant BMIs must be specified explicitly, either directly or
-indirectly dependent BMIs explicitly. See
-https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62707 for details.
+Note: all BMI dependencies must be specified explicitly, either directly or
+indirectly. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62707 for details.
 
 When compiling a ``module implementation unit``, the BMI of the corresponding
 ``primary module interface unit`` must be specified because a module
@@ -380,7 +379,7 @@ For example, the traditional compilation processes for headers are like:
   hdr2.h  --,                                 |
   src2.cpp -+> clang++ src2.cpp --> src2.o ---'
 
-And the compilation process for module units are like:
+And the compilation processes for module units are like:
 
 .. code-block:: text
 
@@ -435,7 +434,7 @@ non-module-unit uses need to be consistent. Consider the following example:
   $ clang++ -std=c++23 Use.cpp -fprebuilt-module-path=.
 
 Clang rejects the example due to the inconsistent language standard modes. Not
-all compiler options are language dialect options, though. For example:
+all compiler options are language-dialect options, though. For example:
 
 .. code-block:: console
 
@@ -465,7 +464,7 @@ translation units.
 Source Files Consistency
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-Clang may open the input files\ :sup:`1`` of a BMI during the compilation. This implies that
+Clang may open the input files [1]_ of a BMI during the compilation. This implies that
 when Clang consumes a BMI, all the input files need to be present in the original path
 and with the original contents.
 
@@ -477,21 +476,21 @@ When the ``-fmodules-embed-all-files`` flag are enabled, Clang explicitly emits
 code into the BMI file, the contents of the BMI file contain a sufficiently verbose
 representation to reproduce the original source file.
 
-:sup:`1`` Input files: The source files which took part in the compilation of the BMI.
-For example:
+.. [1] Input files: The source files which took part in the compilation of the BMI.
+   For example:
 
-.. code-block:: c++
+   .. code-block:: c++
 
-  // M.cppm
-  module;
-  #include "foo.h"
-  export module M;
+     // M.cppm
+     module;
+     #include "foo.h"
+     export module M;
 
-  // foo.h
-  #pragma once
-  #include "bar.h"
+     // foo.h
+     #pragma once
+     #include "bar.h"
 
-The ``M.cppm``, ``foo.h`` and ``bar.h`` are input files for the BMI of ``M.cppm``.
+   The ``M.cppm``, ``foo.h`` and ``bar.h`` are input files for the BMI of ``M.cppm``.
 
 Object definition consistency
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -781,8 +780,8 @@ for the BMI being produced. This ensures that build systems are not required to
 transitively imported modules when deciding whether to recompile.
 
 What is considered to be a potential contributory BMIs is currently unspecified.
-However, it is a severe bug for a BMI to remain unchanged following an observable change
-that affects its consumers.
+However, it is a severe bug for a BMI to remain unchanged following an
+observable change in the module source files that affects the module consumers.
 
 Build systems may utilize this optimization by doing an update-if-changed operation to the BMI
 that is consumed from the BMI that is output by the compiler.
@@ -1192,14 +1191,14 @@ them to ``your_library_imported.h`` too.
 Importing modules
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-When there are dependent libraries providing modules, they should be imported
-in your module as well. Many existing libraries will fall into this category
-once the ``std`` module is more widely available.
+When there are library dependencies providing modules, the module dependencies
+should be imported in your module as well. Many existing libraries will fall
+into this category once the ``std`` module is more widely available.
 
-All dependent libraries providing modules
-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+All library dependencies providing modules
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-Of course, most of the complexity disappears if all the dependent libraries
+Of course, most of the complexity disappears if all the library dependencies
 provide modules.
 
 Headers need to be converted to include third-party headers conditionally. Then,
@@ -1260,8 +1259,8 @@ Non-exported ``using`` declarations are unnecessary if using implementation
 module units. Instead, third-party modules can be imported directly in
 implementation module units.
 
-Partial dependent libraries providing modules
-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+Partial library dependencies providing modules
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
 If the library has to mix the use of ``include`` and ``import`` in its module,
 the primary goal is still the removal of duplicated declarations in translation
@@ -1562,17 +1561,17 @@ file as a header. For example:
   $ clang++ -std=c++20 -fmodule-header=system -xc++-header iostream -o iostream.pcm
   $ clang++ -std=c++20 -fmodule-file=iostream.pcm use.cpp
 
-How to specify dependent BMIs
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+How to specify BMI dependencies
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-``-fmodule-file`` can be used to specify a dependent BMI (or multiple times for
-more than one dependent BMI).
+``-fmodule-file`` can be used to specify a BMI dependency (or multiple times for
+more than one BMI dependency).
 
 With the existing implementation, ``-fprebuilt-module-path`` cannot be used for
 header units (because they are nominally anonymous). For header units, use
 ``-fmodule-file`` to include the relevant PCM file for each header unit.
 
-This is expect to be solved in a future version of Clang either by the compiler
+This is expected to be solved in a future version of Clang either by the compiler
 finding and specifying ``-fmodule-file`` automatically, or by the use of a
 module-mapper that understands how to map the header name to their PCMs.