Skip to content

[clang][bytecode] Check live-ness when calling dtors #137645

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

tbaederr
Copy link
Contributor

We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.

We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.
@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang:bytecode Issues for the clang bytecode constexpr interpreter labels Apr 28, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Apr 28, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

Changes

We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137645.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp (+3)
  • (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp (+11)
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
index 4d89f23401db5..62b449597bca8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
@@ -1375,6 +1375,9 @@ static bool checkConstructor(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const Function *Func,
 }
 
 bool CheckDestructor(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const Pointer &Ptr) {
+  if (!CheckLive(S, OpPC, Ptr, AK_Destroy))
+    return false;
+
   // Can't call a dtor on a global variable.
   if (Ptr.block()->isStatic()) {
     const SourceInfo &E = S.Current->getSource(OpPC);
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp
index 9abfe6b8a15e7..c2fe3d9007480 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp
@@ -1819,3 +1819,14 @@ namespace GlobalDtor {
     a.~A(); // both-note {{cannot modify an object that is visible outside}}
   }
 }
+
+namespace NullDtor {
+  struct S {};
+  constexpr int foo() { // both-error {{never produces a constant expression}}
+     S *s = nullptr;
+     s->~S(); // both-note 2{{destruction of dereferenced null pointer is not allowed in a constant expression}}
+     return 10;
+  }
+  static_assert(foo() == 10, ""); // both-error {{not an integral constant expression}} \
+                                  // both-note {{in call to}}
+}

@tbaederr tbaederr merged commit f8724bd into llvm:main Apr 28, 2025
15 checks passed
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.
GeorgeARM pushed a commit to GeorgeARM/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.
Ankur-0429 pushed a commit to Ankur-0429/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
We can't call a destructor on a dead pointer.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:bytecode Issues for the clang bytecode constexpr interpreter clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants