-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
Reapply "[DAGCombiner] Fold pattern for srl-shl-zext" #140038
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Original commit: bbc5221 Previously reverted due to conflict in lit test. Mainline changed default version of load instruction to untyped version, but test uses previous one.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-nvptx @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag Author: Alexander Peskov (apeskov) ChangesOriginal commit: bbc5221 Previously reverted due to conflict in LIT test. Mainline changed default version of load instruction to untyped version by this #137698 . Updated test uses Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140038.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index d6e288a59b2ee..8671efcfd2fb1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -10972,6 +10972,22 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSRL(SDNode *N) {
return DAG.getNode(ISD::SRL, DL, VT, N0, NewOp1);
}
+ // fold (srl (logic_op x, (shl (zext y), c1)), c1)
+ // -> (logic_op (srl x, c1), (zext y))
+ // c1 <= leadingzeros(zext(y))
+ SDValue X, ZExtY;
+ if (N1C && sd_match(N0, m_OneUse(m_BitwiseLogic(
+ m_Value(X),
+ m_OneUse(m_Shl(m_AllOf(m_Value(ZExtY),
+ m_Opc(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND)),
+ m_Specific(N1))))))) {
+ unsigned NumLeadingZeros = ZExtY.getScalarValueSizeInBits() -
+ ZExtY.getOperand(0).getScalarValueSizeInBits();
+ if (N1C->getZExtValue() <= NumLeadingZeros)
+ return DAG.getNode(N0.getOpcode(), SDLoc(N0), VT,
+ DAG.getNode(ISD::SRL, SDLoc(N0), VT, X, N1), ZExtY);
+ }
+
// fold operands of srl based on knowledge that the low bits are not
// demanded.
if (SimplifyDemandedBits(SDValue(N, 0)))
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/shift-opt.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/shift-opt.ll
index 5f5ad831cb148..65bcbb8e67156 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/shift-opt.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/shift-opt.ll
@@ -6,15 +6,13 @@
define i64 @test_or(i64 %x, i32 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_or(
; CHECK: {
-; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b32 %r<2>;
; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b64 %rd<5>;
; CHECK-EMPTY:
; CHECK-NEXT: // %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b64 %rd1, [test_or_param_0];
-; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %r1, [test_or_param_1];
-; CHECK-NEXT: mul.wide.u32 %rd2, %r1, 32;
-; CHECK-NEXT: or.b64 %rd3, %rd1, %rd2;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u64 %rd4, %rd3, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %rd2, [test_or_param_1];
+; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u64 %rd3, %rd1, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: or.b64 %rd4, %rd3, %rd2;
; CHECK-NEXT: st.param.b64 [func_retval0], %rd4;
; CHECK-NEXT: ret;
%ext = zext i32 %y to i64
@@ -29,15 +27,13 @@ define i64 @test_or(i64 %x, i32 %y) {
define i64 @test_xor(i64 %x, i32 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_xor(
; CHECK: {
-; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b32 %r<2>;
; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b64 %rd<5>;
; CHECK-EMPTY:
; CHECK-NEXT: // %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b64 %rd1, [test_xor_param_0];
-; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %r1, [test_xor_param_1];
-; CHECK-NEXT: mul.wide.u32 %rd2, %r1, 32;
-; CHECK-NEXT: xor.b64 %rd3, %rd1, %rd2;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u64 %rd4, %rd3, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %rd2, [test_xor_param_1];
+; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u64 %rd3, %rd1, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: xor.b64 %rd4, %rd3, %rd2;
; CHECK-NEXT: st.param.b64 [func_retval0], %rd4;
; CHECK-NEXT: ret;
%ext = zext i32 %y to i64
@@ -52,15 +48,13 @@ define i64 @test_xor(i64 %x, i32 %y) {
define i64 @test_and(i64 %x, i32 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_and(
; CHECK: {
-; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b32 %r<2>;
; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b64 %rd<5>;
; CHECK-EMPTY:
; CHECK-NEXT: // %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b64 %rd1, [test_and_param_0];
-; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %r1, [test_and_param_1];
-; CHECK-NEXT: mul.wide.u32 %rd2, %r1, 32;
-; CHECK-NEXT: and.b64 %rd3, %rd1, %rd2;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u64 %rd4, %rd3, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %rd2, [test_and_param_1];
+; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u64 %rd3, %rd1, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: and.b64 %rd4, %rd3, %rd2;
; CHECK-NEXT: st.param.b64 [func_retval0], %rd4;
; CHECK-NEXT: ret;
%ext = zext i32 %y to i64
@@ -76,23 +70,19 @@ define i64 @test_and(i64 %x, i32 %y) {
define <2 x i16> @test_vec(<2 x i16> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_vec(
; CHECK: {
-; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b16 %rs<9>;
-; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b32 %r<7>;
+; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b16 %rs<5>;
+; CHECK-NEXT: .reg .b32 %r<6>;
; CHECK-EMPTY:
; CHECK-NEXT: // %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %r1, [test_vec_param_0];
; CHECK-NEXT: ld.param.b32 %r2, [test_vec_param_1];
; CHECK-NEXT: and.b32 %r3, %r2, 16711935;
-; CHECK-NEXT: mov.b32 {%rs1, %rs2}, %r3;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shl.b16 %rs3, %rs2, 5;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shl.b16 %rs4, %rs1, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: mov.b32 {%rs1, %rs2}, %r1;
+; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u16 %rs3, %rs2, 5;
+; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u16 %rs4, %rs1, 5;
; CHECK-NEXT: mov.b32 %r4, {%rs4, %rs3};
-; CHECK-NEXT: or.b32 %r5, %r1, %r4;
-; CHECK-NEXT: mov.b32 {%rs5, %rs6}, %r5;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u16 %rs7, %rs6, 5;
-; CHECK-NEXT: shr.u16 %rs8, %rs5, 5;
-; CHECK-NEXT: mov.b32 %r6, {%rs8, %rs7};
-; CHECK-NEXT: st.param.b32 [func_retval0], %r6;
+; CHECK-NEXT: or.b32 %r5, %r4, %r3;
+; CHECK-NEXT: st.param.b32 [func_retval0], %r5;
; CHECK-NEXT: ret;
%ext = zext <2 x i8> %y to <2 x i16>
%shl = shl <2 x i16> %ext, splat(i16 5)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - cheers
Original commit: bbc5221
Previously reverted due to conflict in LIT test. Mainline changed default version of load instruction to untyped version by this #137698 . Updated test uses
ld.param.b64
instead ofld.param.u64
.