Skip to content

Reapply "[Clang] Profile singly-resolved UnresolvedLookupExpr with the declaration" #140680

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -741,6 +741,7 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
- Fixed the handling of pack indexing types in the constraints of a member function redeclaration. (#GH138255)
- Clang now correctly parses arbitrary order of ``[[]]``, ``__attribute__`` and ``alignas`` attributes for declarations (#GH133107)
- Fixed a crash when forming an invalid function type in a dependent context. (#GH138657) (#GH115725) (#GH68852)
- Fixed a function declaration mismatch that caused inconsistencies between concepts and variable template declarations. (#GH139476)
- Clang no longer segfaults when there is a configuration mismatch between modules and their users (http://crbug.com/400353616).
- Fix an incorrect deduction when calling an explicit object member function template through an overload set address.
- Fixed bug in constant evaluation that would allow using the value of a
Expand Down
10 changes: 8 additions & 2 deletions clang/lib/AST/StmtProfile.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2189,8 +2189,14 @@ StmtProfiler::VisitCXXPseudoDestructorExpr(const CXXPseudoDestructorExpr *S) {

void StmtProfiler::VisitOverloadExpr(const OverloadExpr *S) {
VisitExpr(S);
VisitNestedNameSpecifier(S->getQualifier());
VisitName(S->getName(), /*TreatAsDecl*/ true);
bool DescribingDependentVarTemplate =
S->getNumDecls() == 1 && isa<VarTemplateDecl>(*S->decls_begin());
Comment on lines +2192 to +2193
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of OverloadExpr, I'm thinking if it would be better to invent a new Expr node to describe dependent cases (we use DeclRefExpr for non-dependent uses), just like ConceptSpecializationExpr.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Except ConceptSpecializationExpr cannot be specialized, so there is that. Maybe a subclass?

I think this scenario can only happen for UnresolvedLookupExpr though, could you check?

We could add a getAsTemplatedDecl function in UnresolvedLookupExpr to help with that.

At the same time, I've used UnresolvedLookupExpr to model concept template template parameters too, and maybe having a dedicated class would be cleaner

if (DescribingDependentVarTemplate) {
VisitDecl(*S->decls_begin());
} else {
VisitNestedNameSpecifier(S->getQualifier());
VisitName(S->getName(), /*TreatAsDecl*/ true);
}
ID.AddBoolean(S->hasExplicitTemplateArgs());
if (S->hasExplicitTemplateArgs())
VisitTemplateArguments(S->getTemplateArgs(), S->getNumTemplateArgs());
Expand Down
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/SemaCXX/exception-spec.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,3 +52,24 @@ namespace AssignmentOp {
D2 &operator=(const D2&); // expected-error {{more lax}}
};
}

namespace OverloadedFunctions {

template <typename T>
void f(T&) noexcept;

template <typename T, int N>
void f(T (&arr)[N]) noexcept(noexcept(f(*arr)));

template <typename T>
inline void f(T&) noexcept {}

template <typename T, int N>
inline void f(T (&arr)[N]) noexcept(noexcept(f(*arr))) {}

void g() {
int x[1];
f(x);
}

}
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-out-of-line-def.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -853,3 +853,18 @@ template <int... Ts>
requires C<Ts...[0]>
auto TplClass<int>::buggy() -> void {}
}

namespace GH139476 {

namespace moo {
template <typename T>
constexpr bool baa = true;

template <typename T> requires baa<T>
void caw();
}

template <typename T> requires moo::baa<T>
void moo::caw() {}

}
Loading