[clang][NFC] Remove dead PassTypeToPlacementDelete field #143448
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…te field This field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it.
llvmbot
added
clang
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt) ChangesThe CallDeleteDuringNew::PassTypeToPlacementDelete field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143448.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp
index 024254b0affe4..359e30cb8f5cd 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp
@@ -1446,8 +1446,6 @@ namespace {
unsigned NumPlacementArgs : 30;
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(AlignedAllocationMode)
unsigned PassAlignmentToPlacementDelete : 1;
- LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(TypeAwareAllocationMode)
- unsigned PassTypeToPlacementDelete : 1;
const FunctionDecl *OperatorDelete;
RValueTy TypeIdentity;
ValueTy Ptr;
|
sorry for the delay, just completely forgot about it |
rorth
pushed a commit
to rorth/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
The CallDeleteDuringNew::PassTypeToPlacementDelete field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it.
DhruvSrivastavaX
pushed a commit
to DhruvSrivastavaX/lldb-for-aix
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2025
The CallDeleteDuringNew::PassTypeToPlacementDelete field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it.
tomtor
pushed a commit
to tomtor/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2025
The CallDeleteDuringNew::PassTypeToPlacementDelete field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The CallDeleteDuringNew::PassTypeToPlacementDelete field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it.