-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[InstCombine] Combine interleaved PHI reduction chains. #143878
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rj-jesus
wants to merge
4
commits into
llvm:main
Choose a base branch
from
rj-jesus:rjj/combine-phi-reductions
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,560
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does the pattern start matching at one of the phi nodes rather than at %rdx? This is pretty unusual for InstCombine, and it's not immediately obvious to me why it is necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a similar transform in
InstCombinerImpl::foldBinopWithPhiOperands
. But it looks hard to refactor the code :(There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @nikic, @dtcxzyw, I apologise for the delayed response. I was out of the office for most of last week.
Given that I was specifically looking for sequences of interleaved recurrences, it seemed that starting at one of the phi nodes and working down from there would potentially allow bailing out sooner than if the match had started from
%rdx
. But I'm not precious about it, I'm happy to start the match from%rdx
and/or move the pattern elsewhere if that's more appropriate.Would it be preferable to move the pattern to a method similar to
foldBinopWithPhiOperands
and start the match from%rdx
? Or do you have something else in mind? :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be better to handle this pattern in a separate helper like
foldBinopWithRecurrence
, then call it insidefoldBinopWithPhiOperands
. This approach may reuse some existing checks and avoid adding calls toInstCombinerImpl::visit[BinOp]
.