-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
Reland [Driver] Add support for crtbegin.o, crtend.o and libgloss lib to BareMetal toolchain object #144649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+246
−13
Merged
Reland [Driver] Add support for crtbegin.o, crtend.o and libgloss lib to BareMetal toolchain object #144649
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line was failing on my bots like so: http://45.33.8.238/macm1/109605/step_6.txt
The other files touched in this commit are fine.
My bots use the GN build, which uses the old runtimes layout (what you get in the cmake build with
--DLLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=OFF
). However, this does not reproduce for me locally, so maybe it's dependent on some incremental build state.It looks like the problem is that clang prints
libclang_rt.builtins-aarch64.a
(with the-aarch64
suffix).5220e4f fixed it.
Does that make sense to you?
Would this fail with
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=OFF
in CMake too? Is this the right fix? Is it needed in other tests too?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you confirm if you are still seeing the error on your buildbots?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, as I said:
I'm just looking for answers to the questions in the last two paragraphs :)