-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[VPlan] Support VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipes with EVL tail folding #144666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
lukel97
wants to merge
6
commits into
llvm:main
Choose a base branch
from
lukel97:loop-vectorize/evl-VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cab6f07
[VPlan] Support VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipes with EVL tail folding
lukel97 4e15c3f
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:llvm/llvm-project into loop-vectori…
lukel97 45a6d99
Update tests
lukel97 b3c55e2
Use Builder.createScalarZExtOrTrunc
lukel97 fcb8bb7
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:llvm/llvm-project into loop-vectori…
lukel97 0037eb2
Rename variable
lukel97 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ bool VPlanVerifier::verifyEVLRecipe(const VPInstruction &EVL) const { | |
.Case<VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe>([&](const VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe *S) { | ||
return VerifyEVLUse(*S, S->getNumOperands() - 1); | ||
}) | ||
.Case<VPWidenStoreEVLRecipe, VPReductionEVLRecipe>( | ||
.Case<VPWidenStoreEVLRecipe, VPReductionEVLRecipe, | ||
VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe>( | ||
[&](const VPRecipeBase *S) { return VerifyEVLUse(*S, 2); }) | ||
.Case<VPWidenLoadEVLRecipe, VPVectorEndPointerRecipe>( | ||
[&](const VPRecipeBase *R) { return VerifyEVLUse(*R, 1); }) | ||
|
@@ -165,18 +166,30 @@ bool VPlanVerifier::verifyEVLRecipe(const VPInstruction &EVL) const { | |
.Case<VPInstruction>([&](const VPInstruction *I) { | ||
if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::PHI) | ||
return VerifyEVLUse(*I, 1); | ||
if (I->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add) { | ||
errs() << "EVL is used as an operand in non-VPInstruction::Add\n"; | ||
switch (I->getOpcode()) { | ||
case Instruction::Add: | ||
break; | ||
case Instruction::UIToFP: | ||
case Instruction::Trunc: | ||
case Instruction::ZExt: | ||
case Instruction::Mul: | ||
case Instruction::FMul: | ||
if (!VerifyLate) { | ||
errs() << "EVL used by unexpected VPInstruction\n"; | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
default: | ||
errs() << "EVL used by unexpected VPInstruction\n"; | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
if (I->getNumUsers() != 1) { | ||
errs() << "EVL is used in VPInstruction:Add with multiple " | ||
"users\n"; | ||
errs() << "EVL is used in VPInstruction with multiple users\n"; | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
if (!VerifyLate && !isa<VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe>(*I->users().begin())) { | ||
errs() << "Result of VPInstruction::Add with EVL operand is " | ||
"not used by VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe\n"; | ||
errs() << "Result of VPInstruction with EVL operand is not used by " | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These changes seem unneeded? |
||
"VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe\n"; | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
return true; | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What purpose does this switch serve? It seems to be the same functionally as the prior if-clause?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previously any user of EVL that wasn't an add was an error. This switch statement relaxes it to also allow UIToFP/Trunc/ZExt/Mul/FMul when VerifyLate is true, i.e. after the VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe is expanded.
The changes to the comments below are to reflect the fact that it we allow no longer just adds.
I'm also in half a mind here that we should just skip verifying EVL uses when VerifyLate is true, I think we'll need to add more cases for VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, the VerifyLate flag here is what confused me. I see it now.