Skip to content

[IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for Embeddings #145118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: users/svkeerthy/06-20-increasing_tolerance_in_approximatelyequals
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

svkeerthy
Copy link
Contributor

@svkeerthy svkeerthy commented Jun 20, 2025

Add out-of-place addition operator for Embedding class in IR2Vec.

This is used in subsequent patches.

(Tracking issue - #141817)

@svkeerthy svkeerthy changed the title Overloading operator+ for Embeddngs [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for Embeddngs Jun 20, 2025
@svkeerthy svkeerthy changed the title [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for Embeddngs [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for Embeddings Jun 20, 2025
@svkeerthy svkeerthy changed the title [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for Embeddings [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for `Embeddings Jun 20, 2025
@svkeerthy svkeerthy changed the title [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for `Embeddings [IR2Vec] Overloading operator+ for Embeddings Jun 20, 2025
@svkeerthy svkeerthy marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 23:33
@llvmbot llvmbot added mlgo llvm:analysis Includes value tracking, cost tables and constant folding labels Jun 20, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 20, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlgo

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

Author: S. VenkataKeerthy (svkeerthy)

Changes

Add out-of-place addition operator for Embedding class in IR2Vec.

This is used in subsequent patches.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145118.diff

3 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IR2Vec.h (+1)
  • (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/IR2Vec.cpp (+8)
  • (modified) llvm/unittests/Analysis/IR2VecTest.cpp (+18)
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IR2Vec.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IR2Vec.h
index 480b834077b86..f6c40d36f8026 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IR2Vec.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/IR2Vec.h
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct Embedding {
   const std::vector<double> &getData() const { return Data; }
 
   /// Arithmetic operators
+  Embedding operator+(const Embedding &RHS) const;
   Embedding &operator+=(const Embedding &RHS);
   Embedding &operator-=(const Embedding &RHS);
   Embedding &operator*=(double Factor);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/IR2Vec.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/IR2Vec.cpp
index 27cc2a4109879..d5d27db8bd2bf 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/IR2Vec.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/IR2Vec.cpp
@@ -71,6 +71,14 @@ inline bool fromJSON(const llvm::json::Value &E, Embedding &Out,
 // Embedding
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
+Embedding Embedding::operator+(const Embedding &RHS) const {
+  assert(this->size() == RHS.size() && "Vectors must have the same dimension");
+  Embedding Result(*this);
+  std::transform(this->begin(), this->end(), RHS.begin(), Result.begin(),
+                 std::plus<double>());
+  return Result;
+}
+
 Embedding &Embedding::operator+=(const Embedding &RHS) {
   assert(this->size() == RHS.size() && "Vectors must have the same dimension");
   std::transform(this->begin(), this->end(), RHS.begin(), this->begin(),
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IR2VecTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IR2VecTest.cpp
index 33ac16828eb6c..50eb7f73c6f50 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IR2VecTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/IR2VecTest.cpp
@@ -109,6 +109,18 @@ TEST(EmbeddingTest, ConstructorsAndAccessors) {
   }
 }
 
+TEST(EmbeddingTest, AddVectorsOutOfPlace) {
+  Embedding E1 = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
+  Embedding E2 = {0.5, 1.5, -1.0};
+
+  Embedding E3 = E1 + E2;
+  EXPECT_THAT(E3, ElementsAre(1.5, 3.5, 2.0));
+
+  // Check that E1 and E2 are unchanged
+  EXPECT_THAT(E1, ElementsAre(1.0, 2.0, 3.0));
+  EXPECT_THAT(E2, ElementsAre(0.5, 1.5, -1.0));
+}
+
 TEST(EmbeddingTest, AddVectors) {
   Embedding E1 = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
   Embedding E2 = {0.5, 1.5, -1.0};
@@ -180,6 +192,12 @@ TEST(EmbeddingTest, AccessOutOfBounds) {
   EXPECT_DEATH(E[4] = 4.0, "Index out of bounds");
 }
 
+TEST(EmbeddingTest, MismatchedDimensionsAddVectorsOutOfPlace) {
+  Embedding E1 = {1.0, 2.0};
+  Embedding E2 = {1.0};
+  EXPECT_DEATH(E1 + E2, "Vectors must have the same dimension");
+}
+
 TEST(EmbeddingTest, MismatchedDimensionsAddVectors) {
   Embedding E1 = {1.0, 2.0};
   Embedding E2 = {1.0};

@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct Embedding {
const std::vector<double> &getData() const { return Data; }

/// Arithmetic operators
Embedding operator+(const Embedding &RHS) const;
Copy link
Member

@mtrofin mtrofin Jun 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should you also overload operator - for consistency - same rationale as "overload operator != if overloading =="?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Will add them too!

@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-increasing_tolerance_in_approximatelyequals branch from d05856c to bf89c59 Compare June 23, 2025 21:10
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-overloading_operator_for_embeddngs branch 2 times, most recently from 23de35c to 8345bbe Compare June 30, 2025 20:56
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-increasing_tolerance_in_approximatelyequals branch 2 times, most recently from 0472d10 to b2c203a Compare June 30, 2025 21:11
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-overloading_operator_for_embeddngs branch 2 times, most recently from 2846872 to 187a8fb Compare July 1, 2025 01:11
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-increasing_tolerance_in_approximatelyequals branch 2 times, most recently from 6cf6937 to ec1d9d6 Compare July 1, 2025 01:20
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-overloading_operator_for_embeddngs branch from 187a8fb to 14e7d5b Compare July 1, 2025 01:20
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-increasing_tolerance_in_approximatelyequals branch from ec1d9d6 to 7516580 Compare July 1, 2025 01:25
@svkeerthy svkeerthy force-pushed the users/svkeerthy/06-20-overloading_operator_for_embeddngs branch from 14e7d5b to 06d0a11 Compare July 1, 2025 01:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
llvm:analysis Includes value tracking, cost tables and constant folding mlgo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants