[libc++] Implement ranges::contains

[ZijunZhaoCCK]

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159232

Running ./ranges_contains.libcxx.out
Run on (10 X 24.121 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
  L1 Data 64 KiB (x10)
  L1 Instruction 128 KiB (x10)
  L2 Unified 4096 KiB (x5)
Load Average: 3.37, 6.77, 5.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                          Time             CPU   Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
bm_contains_char/16             1.88 ns         1.87 ns    371607095
bm_contains_char/256            7.48 ns         7.47 ns     93292285
bm_contains_char/4096           99.7 ns         99.6 ns      7013185
bm_contains_char/65536          1296 ns         1294 ns       540436
bm_contains_char/1048576       23887 ns        23860 ns        29302
bm_contains_char/16777216     389420 ns       389095 ns         1796
bm_contains_int/16              7.14 ns         7.14 ns     97776288
bm_contains_int/256             90.4 ns         90.3 ns      7558089
bm_contains_int/4096            1294 ns         1290 ns       543052
bm_contains_int/65536          20482 ns        20443 ns        34334
bm_contains_int/1048576       328817 ns       327965 ns         2147
bm_contains_int/16777216     5246279 ns      5239361 ns          133
bm_contains_bool/16             2.19 ns         2.19 ns    322565780
bm_contains_bool/256            3.42 ns         3.41 ns    205025467
bm_contains_bool/4096           22.1 ns         22.1 ns     31780479
bm_contains_bool/65536           333 ns          332 ns      2106606
bm_contains_bool/1048576        5126 ns         5119 ns       135901
bm_contains_bool/16777216      81656 ns        81574 ns         8569

[ldionne]

It looks like you need to rebase your patch on top of main!

[cjdb]

LGTM following applying Eric's feedback from our meeting. Thank you for working on this!

[EricWF]

LGTM minus the added comments. I'll LGTM formally after looking at the changes.

[EricWF]

LGTM. Please what for other reviewers who have requested changes to LGTM as well.

Also please convert this "Draft" PR into a non-draft one.

[EricWF]

LGTM again. Thanks!

[philnik777]

LGTM % comment.