Skip to content

[flang] Fix construct names on labeled DO #67622

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions flang/include/flang/Parser/parse-tree.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2259,15 +2259,18 @@ struct LoopControl {
};

// R1121 label-do-stmt -> [do-construct-name :] DO label [loop-control]
// A label-do-stmt with a do-construct-name is parsed as a non-label-do-stmt.
struct LabelDoStmt {
TUPLE_CLASS_BOILERPLATE(LabelDoStmt);
std::tuple<std::optional<Name>, Label, std::optional<LoopControl>> t;
std::tuple<Label, std::optional<LoopControl>> t;
};

// R1122 nonlabel-do-stmt -> [do-construct-name :] DO [loop-control]
struct NonLabelDoStmt {
TUPLE_CLASS_BOILERPLATE(NonLabelDoStmt);
std::tuple<std::optional<Name>, std::optional<LoopControl>> t;
std::tuple<std::optional<Name>, std::optional<Label>,
std::optional<LoopControl>>
t;
};

// R1132 end-do-stmt -> END DO [do-construct-name]
Expand Down
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions flang/lib/Parser/executable-parsers.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -279,13 +279,17 @@ TYPE_CONTEXT_PARSER("loop control"_en_US,
many(Parser<LocalitySpec>{})))))

// R1121 label-do-stmt -> [do-construct-name :] DO label [loop-control]
// A label-do-stmt with a do-construct-name is parsed as a nonlabel-do-stmt
// with an optional label.
TYPE_CONTEXT_PARSER("label DO statement"_en_US,
construct<LabelDoStmt>(
maybe(name / ":"), "DO" >> label, maybe(loopControl)))
construct<LabelDoStmt>("DO" >> label, maybe(loopControl)))

// R1122 nonlabel-do-stmt -> [do-construct-name :] DO [loop-control]
TYPE_CONTEXT_PARSER("nonlabel DO statement"_en_US,
construct<NonLabelDoStmt>(maybe(name / ":"), "DO" >> maybe(loopControl)))
construct<NonLabelDoStmt>(
name / ":", "DO" >> maybe(label), maybe(loopControl)) ||
construct<NonLabelDoStmt>(construct<std::optional<Name>>(),
construct<std::optional<Label>>(), "DO" >> maybe(loopControl)))

// R1132 end-do-stmt -> END DO [do-construct-name]
TYPE_CONTEXT_PARSER("END DO statement"_en_US,
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions flang/lib/Parser/unparse.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1001,13 +1001,14 @@ class UnparseVisitor {
Walk(std::get<Statement<EndDoStmt>>(x.t));
}
void Unparse(const LabelDoStmt &x) { // R1121
Walk(std::get<std::optional<Name>>(x.t), ": ");
Word("DO "), Walk(std::get<Label>(x.t));
Walk(" ", std::get<std::optional<LoopControl>>(x.t));
}
void Unparse(const NonLabelDoStmt &x) { // R1122
Walk(std::get<std::optional<Name>>(x.t), ": ");
Word("DO "), Walk(std::get<std::optional<LoopControl>>(x.t));
Word("DO ");
Walk(std::get<std::optional<Label>>(x.t), " ");
Walk(std::get<std::optional<LoopControl>>(x.t));
}
void Unparse(const LoopControl &x) { // R1123
common::visit(common::visitors{
Expand Down
9 changes: 4 additions & 5 deletions flang/lib/Semantics/canonicalize-do.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -117,16 +117,15 @@ class CanonicalizationOfDoLoops {
std::get<ExecutableConstruct>(doLoop->u).u)};
auto &loopControl{
std::get<std::optional<LoopControl>>(labelDo.statement.value().t)};
auto &name{std::get<std::optional<Name>>(labelDo.statement.value().t)};
Statement<NonLabelDoStmt> nonLabelDoStmt{std::move(labelDo.label),
NonLabelDoStmt{
std::make_tuple(common::Clone(name), std::move(loopControl))}};
NonLabelDoStmt{std::make_tuple(std::optional<Name>{},
std::optional<Label>{}, std::move(loopControl))}};
nonLabelDoStmt.source = originalSource;
std::get<ExecutableConstruct>(doLoop->u).u =
common::Indirection<DoConstruct>{
std::make_tuple(std::move(nonLabelDoStmt), std::move(block),
Statement<EndDoStmt>{
std::optional<Label>{}, EndDoStmt{std::move(name)}})};
Statement<EndDoStmt>{std::optional<Label>{},
EndDoStmt{std::optional<Name>{}}})};
stack.pop_back();
} while (!stack.empty() && stack.back().label == currentLabel);
i = --next;
Expand Down
43 changes: 39 additions & 4 deletions flang/lib/Semantics/resolve-labels.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -275,7 +275,29 @@ class ParseTreeAnalyzer {
return PushConstructName(criticalConstruct);
}
bool Pre(const parser::DoConstruct &doConstruct) {
return PushConstructName(doConstruct);
const auto &optionalName{std::get<std::optional<parser::Name>>(
std::get<parser::Statement<parser::NonLabelDoStmt>>(doConstruct.t)
.statement.t)};
if (optionalName) {
constructNames_.emplace_back(optionalName->ToString());
}
// Allow FORTRAN '66 extended DO ranges
PushScope().isExteriorGotoFatal = false;
// Process labels of the DO and END DO statements, but not the
// statements themselves, so that a non-construct END DO
// can be distinguished (below).
Pre(std::get<parser::Statement<parser::NonLabelDoStmt>>(doConstruct.t));
Walk(std::get<parser::Block>(doConstruct.t), *this);
Pre(std::get<parser::Statement<parser::EndDoStmt>>(doConstruct.t));
PopConstructName(doConstruct);
return false;
}
void Post(const parser::EndDoStmt &endDoStmt) {
// Visited only for non-construct labeled DO termination
if (const auto &name{endDoStmt.v}) {
context_.Say(name->source, "Unexpected DO construct name '%s'"_err_en_US,
name->source);
}
}
bool Pre(const parser::IfConstruct &ifConstruct) {
return PushConstructName(ifConstruct);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -330,9 +352,6 @@ class ParseTreeAnalyzer {
void Post(const parser::CriticalConstruct &criticalConstruct) {
PopConstructName(criticalConstruct);
}
void Post(const parser::DoConstruct &doConstruct) {
PopConstructName(doConstruct);
}
void Post(const parser::IfConstruct &ifConstruct) {
PopConstructName(ifConstruct);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -716,6 +735,22 @@ class ParseTreeAnalyzer {
// C1131
void CheckName(const parser::DoConstruct &doConstruct) {
CheckEndName<parser::NonLabelDoStmt, parser::EndDoStmt>("DO", doConstruct);
if (auto label{std::get<std::optional<parser::Label>>(
std::get<parser::Statement<parser::NonLabelDoStmt>>(doConstruct.t)
.statement.t)}) {
const auto &endDoStmt{
std::get<parser::Statement<parser::EndDoStmt>>(doConstruct.t)};
if (!endDoStmt.label || *endDoStmt.label != *label) {
context_
.Say(endDoStmt.source,
"END DO statement must have the label '%d' matching its DO statement"_err_en_US,
*label)
.Attach(std::get<parser::Statement<parser::NonLabelDoStmt>>(
doConstruct.t)
.source,
"corresponding DO statement"_en_US);
}
}
}
// C1035
void CheckName(const parser::ForallConstruct &forallConstruct) {
Expand Down
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions flang/test/Semantics/dosemantics13.f90
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
! RUN: %python %S/test_errors.py %s %flang_fc1
program main

integer j, k

lab1: do j=1,10
cycle lab1
exit lab1
end do lab1

lab2: do 2 j=1,10
cycle lab2
exit lab2
2 end do lab2

lab3: do 3 j=1,10
cycle lab3
exit lab3
!ERROR: DO construct name required but missing
3 end do

do 4 j=1,10
!ERROR: Unexpected DO construct name 'lab4'
4 end do lab4

lab5: do 5 j=1,10
!ERROR: END DO statement must have the label '5' matching its DO statement
666 end do lab5
end
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions flang/test/Semantics/dosemantics14.f90
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
! RUN: %python %S/test_errors.py %s %flang_fc1
subroutine bad1
lab1: do 1 j=1,10
1 continue
!ERROR: expected 'END DO'
end

subroutine bad2
lab2: do 2 j=1,10
2 k = j
!ERROR: expected 'END DO'
end