Skip to content

[clang][Interp] Correctly emit destructors for multi-dimensional arrays #69140

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

tbaederr
Copy link
Contributor

We were not taking those into account correctly when emitting destructors. Fix that and add tests for it.

Fixes #69115

@tbaederr tbaederr added the clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" label Oct 16, 2023
@llvmbot llvmbot added the clang Clang issues not falling into any other category label Oct 16, 2023
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Oct 16, 2023

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

Changes

We were not taking those into account correctly when emitting destructors. Fix that and add tests for it.

Fixes #69115


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69140.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp (+21-12)
  • (modified) clang/test/AST/Interp/arrays.cpp (+57)
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
index e9e20b222d5d34f..122c505078c77ef 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp
@@ -2661,19 +2661,28 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen<Emitter>::emitRecordDestruction(const Descriptor *Desc) {
   // Arrays.
   if (Desc->isArray()) {
     const Descriptor *ElemDesc = Desc->ElemDesc;
-    const Record *ElemRecord = ElemDesc->ElemRecord;
-    assert(ElemRecord); // This is not a primitive array.
+    assert(ElemDesc);
+
+    // Don't need to do anything for these.
+    if (ElemDesc->isPrimitiveArray())
+      return this->emitPopPtr(SourceInfo{});
+
+    // If this is an array of record types, check if we need
+    // to call the element destructors at all. If not, try
+    // to save the work.
+    if (const Record *ElemRecord = ElemDesc->ElemRecord) {
+      if (const CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = ElemRecord->getDestructor();
+          !Dtor || Dtor->isTrivial())
+        return this->emitPopPtr(SourceInfo{});
+    }
 
-    if (const CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = ElemRecord->getDestructor();
-        Dtor && !Dtor->isTrivial()) {
-      for (ssize_t I = Desc->getNumElems() - 1; I >= 0; --I) {
-        if (!this->emitConstUint64(I, SourceInfo{}))
-          return false;
-        if (!this->emitArrayElemPtrUint64(SourceInfo{}))
-          return false;
-        if (!this->emitRecordDestruction(Desc->ElemDesc))
-          return false;
-      }
+    for (ssize_t I = Desc->getNumElems() - 1; I >= 0; --I) {
+      if (!this->emitConstUint64(I, SourceInfo{}))
+        return false;
+      if (!this->emitArrayElemPtrUint64(SourceInfo{}))
+        return false;
+      if (!this->emitRecordDestruction(ElemDesc))
+        return false;
     }
     return this->emitPopPtr(SourceInfo{});
   }
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/Interp/arrays.cpp b/clang/test/AST/Interp/arrays.cpp
index 281835f828bbd7c..3aa58443089d499 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/Interp/arrays.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/Interp/arrays.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter -std=c++20 -verify %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=ref %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=ref -std=c++20 %s
 
 constexpr int m = 3;
 constexpr const int *foo[][5] = {
@@ -390,3 +392,58 @@ namespace StringZeroFill {
   static_assert(b[4] == '\0', "");
   static_assert(b[5] == '\0', "");
 }
+
+namespace GH69115 {
+  /// This used to crash because we were trying to emit destructors for the
+  /// array.
+  constexpr int foo() {
+    int arr[2][2] = {1, 2, 3, 4};
+    return 0;
+  }
+  static_assert(foo() == 0, "");
+
+  /// Test that we still emit the destructors for multi-dimensional
+  /// composite arrays.
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+  constexpr void assert(bool C) {
+    if (C)
+      return;
+    // Invalid in constexpr.
+    (void)(1 / 0); // expected-warning {{undefined}} \
+                   // ref-warning {{undefined}}
+  }
+
+  class F {
+  public:
+    int a;
+    int *dtor;
+    int &idx;
+    constexpr F(int a, int *dtor, int &idx) : a(a), dtor(dtor), idx(idx) {}
+    constexpr ~F() noexcept(false){
+      dtor[idx] = a;
+      ++idx;
+    }
+  };
+  constexpr int foo2() {
+    int dtorIndices[] = {0, 0, 0, 0};
+    int idx = 0;
+
+    {
+      F arr[2][2] = {F(1, dtorIndices, idx),
+                     F(2, dtorIndices, idx),
+                     F(3, dtorIndices, idx),
+                     F(4, dtorIndices, idx)};
+    }
+
+    /// Reverse-reverse order.
+    assert(idx == 4);
+    assert(dtorIndices[0] == 4);
+    assert(dtorIndices[1] == 3);
+    assert(dtorIndices[2] == 2);
+    assert(dtorIndices[3] == 1);
+
+    return 0;
+  }
+  static_assert(foo2() == 0, "");
+#endif
+}

@tbaederr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping

Copy link
Collaborator

@AaronBallman AaronBallman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

We were not taking those into account correctly when emitting
destructors. Fix that and add tests for it.

Fixes llvm#69115
@tbaederr tbaederr merged commit e01efdd into llvm:main Oct 26, 2023
zahiraam pushed a commit to zahiraam/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2023
…ys (llvm#69140)

We were not taking those into account correctly when emitting
destructors. Fix that and add tests for it.

Fixes llvm#69115
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Interp crashing on nested ArrayInitLoopExpr
3 participants