Skip to content

[libc++][Android] Don't list Android as supported yet #69660

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

rprichard
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: #69270

@rprichard rprichard added libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. platform:android labels Oct 19, 2023
@rprichard rprichard requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2023 23:19
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Oct 19, 2023

@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx

Author: Ryan Prichard (rprichard)

Changes

Issue: #69270


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69660.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) libcxx/docs/index.rst (-1)
diff --git a/libcxx/docs/index.rst b/libcxx/docs/index.rst
index 72c80d7dc954a33..9c2a83bde3c0f4f 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/index.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/index.rst
@@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ Target platform Target architecture       Notes
 macOS 10.9+     i386, x86_64, arm64       Building the shared library itself requires targetting macOS 10.13+
 FreeBSD 12+     i386, x86_64, arm
 Linux           i386, x86_64, arm, arm64  Only glibc-2.24 and later and no other libc is officially supported
-Android 5.0+    i386, x86_64, arm, arm64
 Windows         i386, x86_64              Both MSVC and MinGW style environments, ABI in MSVC environments is :doc:`unstable <DesignDocs/ABIVersioning>`
 AIX 7.2TL5+     powerpc, powerpc64
 =============== ========================= ============================

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. platform:android
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants