-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[lldb] [debugserver] Shut down the exception thread when clearing #70979
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[lldb] [debugserver] Shut down the exception thread when clearing #70979
Conversation
MachProcess has a MachTask as an ivar. In the MachProcess dtor, we call MachTask::Clear() to clear its state, before running the dtor of all our ivars, including the MachTask one. When we attach on darwin, MachProcess calls MachTask::StartExceptionThread which does the task_for_pid and then starts a thread to listen for mach messages. Then MachProcess calls ptrace(PT_ATTACHEXC). If that ptrace() fails, MachProcess will call MachTask::Clear. But the exception thread is now up & running and is not stopped; its ivars will be reset by the Clear() method, and its object will be freed after the dtor runs. Actually eliciting a crash in this scenario is very timing sensitive; I hand-modified debugserver to fail to PT_ATTACHEXC trying to simulate it on my desktop and was unable. But looking at the source, and an occasional crash report we've received, it's clear that this is possible. rdar://117521198
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Jason Molenda (jasonmolenda) ChangesMachProcess has a MachTask as an ivar. In the MachProcess dtor, we call MachTask::Clear() to clear its state, before running the dtor of all our ivars, including the MachTask one. When we attach on darwin, MachProcess calls MachTask::StartExceptionThread which does the task_for_pid and then starts a thread to listen for mach messages. Then MachProcess calls ptrace(PT_ATTACHEXC). If that ptrace() fails, MachProcess will call MachTask::Clear. But the exception thread is now up & running and is not stopped; its ivars will be reset by the Clear() method, and its object will be freed after the dtor runs. Actually eliciting a crash in this scenario is very timing sensitive; I hand-modified debugserver to fail to PT_ATTACHEXC trying to simulate it on my desktop and was unable. But looking at the source, and an occasional crash report we've received, it's clear that this is possible. rdar://117521198 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70979.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/tools/debugserver/source/MacOSX/MachTask.mm b/lldb/tools/debugserver/source/MacOSX/MachTask.mm
index 4f5b4039243f662..fd2ac64ac6cf79c 100644
--- a/lldb/tools/debugserver/source/MacOSX/MachTask.mm
+++ b/lldb/tools/debugserver/source/MacOSX/MachTask.mm
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
void MachTask::Clear() {
// Do any cleanup needed for this task
+ if (m_exception_thread)
+ ShutDownExcecptionThread();
m_task = TASK_NULL;
m_exception_thread = 0;
m_exception_port = MACH_PORT_NULL;
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. LGTM!
…vm#70979) MachProcess has a MachTask as an ivar. In the MachProcess dtor, we call MachTask::Clear() to clear its state, before running the dtor of all our ivars, including the MachTask one. When we attach on darwin, MachProcess calls MachTask::StartExceptionThread which does the task_for_pid and then starts a thread to listen for mach messages. Then MachProcess calls ptrace(PT_ATTACHEXC). If that ptrace() fails, MachProcess will call MachTask::Clear. But the exception thread is now up & running and is not stopped; its ivars will be reset by the Clear() method, and its object will be freed after the dtor runs. Actually eliciting a crash in this scenario is very timing sensitive; I hand-modified debugserver to fail to PT_ATTACHEXC trying to simulate it on my desktop and was unable. But looking at the source, and an occasional crash report we've received, it's clear that this is possible. rdar://117521198 (cherry picked from commit 66b9283)
…tion-thread-from-MachTask-Clear [lldb] [debugserver] Shut down the exception thread when clearing (llvm#70979)
…vm#70979) MachProcess has a MachTask as an ivar. In the MachProcess dtor, we call MachTask::Clear() to clear its state, before running the dtor of all our ivars, including the MachTask one. When we attach on darwin, MachProcess calls MachTask::StartExceptionThread which does the task_for_pid and then starts a thread to listen for mach messages. Then MachProcess calls ptrace(PT_ATTACHEXC). If that ptrace() fails, MachProcess will call MachTask::Clear. But the exception thread is now up & running and is not stopped; its ivars will be reset by the Clear() method, and its object will be freed after the dtor runs. Actually eliciting a crash in this scenario is very timing sensitive; I hand-modified debugserver to fail to PT_ATTACHEXC trying to simulate it on my desktop and was unable. But looking at the source, and an occasional crash report we've received, it's clear that this is possible. rdar://117521198 (cherry picked from commit 66b9283)
…-when-clearing [lldb] [debugserver] Shut down the exception thread when clearing (llvm#70979)
MachProcess has a MachTask as an ivar. In the MachProcess dtor, we call MachTask::Clear() to clear its state, before running the dtor of all our ivars, including the MachTask one.
When we attach on darwin, MachProcess calls MachTask::StartExceptionThread which does the task_for_pid and then starts a thread to listen for mach messages. Then MachProcess calls ptrace(PT_ATTACHEXC). If that ptrace() fails, MachProcess will call MachTask::Clear. But the exception thread is now up & running and is not stopped; its ivars will be reset by the Clear() method, and its object will be freed after the dtor runs.
Actually eliciting a crash in this scenario is very timing sensitive; I hand-modified debugserver to fail to PT_ATTACHEXC trying to simulate it on my desktop and was unable. But looking at the source, and an occasional crash report we've received, it's clear that this is possible.
rdar://117521198