-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[Clang][Sema] Differentiate between partial/explicit specializations when diagnosing unexpanded packs #72015
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72015.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 4614324babb1c91..0c8f07b095b1eaa 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5655,9 +5655,9 @@ def err_unexpanded_parameter_pack : Error<
"%select{expression|base type|declaration type|data member type|bit-field "
"size|static assertion|fixed underlying type|enumerator value|"
"using declaration|friend declaration|qualifier|initializer|default argument|"
- "non-type template parameter type|exception type|partial specialization|"
- "__if_exists name|__if_not_exists name|lambda|block|type constraint|"
- "requirement|requires clause}0 "
+ "non-type template parameter type|exception type|explicit specialization|"
+ "partial specialization|__if_exists name|__if_not_exists name|lambda|block|"
+ "type constraint|requirement|requires clause}0 "
"contains%plural{0: an|:}1 unexpanded parameter pack"
"%plural{0:|1: %2|2:s %2 and %3|:s %2, %3, ...}1">;
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
index f69f366c1750918..e59827b8c281ea1 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
@@ -8839,6 +8839,9 @@ class Sema final {
/// The type of an exception.
UPPC_ExceptionType,
+ /// Explicit specialization.
+ UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization,
+
/// Partial specialization.
UPPC_PartialSpecialization,
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 6865e04b94b2050..766ebd90fded0c4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -4559,7 +4559,9 @@ DeclResult Sema::ActOnVarTemplateSpecialization(
// Check for unexpanded parameter packs in any of the template arguments.
for (unsigned I = 0, N = TemplateArgs.size(); I != N; ++I)
if (DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack(TemplateArgs[I],
- UPPC_PartialSpecialization))
+ IsPartialSpecialization
+ ? UPPC_PartialSpecialization
+ : UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization))
return true;
// Check that the template argument list is well-formed for this
@@ -8744,7 +8746,9 @@ DeclResult Sema::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization(
// Check for unexpanded parameter packs in any of the template arguments.
for (unsigned I = 0, N = TemplateArgs.size(); I != N; ++I)
if (DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack(TemplateArgs[I],
- UPPC_PartialSpecialization))
+ isPartialSpecialization
+ ? UPPC_PartialSpecialization
+ : UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization))
return true;
// Check that the template argument list is well-formed for this
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp
index 7536339c14a2e08..d00630b0258a734 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp
@@ -369,9 +369,38 @@ void test_unexpanded_exprs(Types ...values) {
void f(int arg = values); // expected-error{{default argument contains unexpanded parameter pack 'values'}}
}
-// Test unexpanded parameter packs in partial specializations.
-template<typename ...Types>
-struct TestUnexpandedDecls<int, Types>; // expected-error{{partial specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Types'}}
+// Test unexpanded parameter packs in partial/explicit specializations.
+namespace Specializations {
+ template<typename T, typename... Ts>
+ struct PrimaryClass;
+
+ template<typename T, typename... Ts>
+ constexpr int PrimaryVar = 0;
+
+ template<typename... Ts>
+ struct PrimaryClass<Ts>; // expected-error{{partial specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Ts'}}
+
+ template<typename... Ts>
+ constexpr int PrimaryVar<Ts> = 0; // expected-error{{partial specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Ts'}}
+
+ template<typename... Ts>
+ struct OuterClass {
+ template<typename... Us>
+ struct InnerClass;
+ template<typename... Us>
+ constexpr static int InnerVar = 0;
+
+ template<>
+ struct InnerClass<Ts>; // expected-error{{explicit specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Ts'}}
+ template<>
+ constexpr static int InnerVar<Ts> = 0; // expected-error{{explicit specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Ts'}}
+
+ template<typename U>
+ struct InnerClass<U, Ts>; // expected-error{{partial specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Ts'}}
+ template<typename U>
+ constexpr static int InnerVar<U, Ts> = 0; // expected-error{{partial specialization contains unexpanded parameter pack 'Ts'}}
+ };
+}
// Test for diagnostics in the presence of multiple unexpanded
// parameter packs.
|
…iagnosing unexpanded packs
394e2e0
to
3667d76
Compare
Ping @erichkeane |
erichkeane
reviewed
Nov 13, 2023
erichkeane
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2023
@erichkeane Unless you would like someone else to review this, could you please merge this when you have time? I don't have write access 🙂 |
sr-tream
pushed a commit
to sr-tream/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
…when diagnosing unexpanded packs (llvm#72015) This adds `UnexpandedParameterPackContext::UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization` and passes it to `DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack` when checking class/variable template explicit specializations. Right now we don't check for unexpanded packs in function template explicit specializations at all, so I will be addressing that in a followup PR.
zahiraam
pushed a commit
to zahiraam/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
…when diagnosing unexpanded packs (llvm#72015) This adds `UnexpandedParameterPackContext::UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization` and passes it to `DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack` when checking class/variable template explicit specializations. Right now we don't check for unexpanded packs in function template explicit specializations at all, so I will be addressing that in a followup PR.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:frontend
Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema"
clang
Clang issues not falling into any other category
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds
UnexpandedParameterPackContext::UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization
and passes it toDiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack
when checking class/variable template explicit specializations.Right now we don't check for unexpanded packs in function template explicit specializations at all, so I will be addressing that in a followup PR.