-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[XCOFF]refactor isFunction, NFC #72232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
suggested in review of llvm#69553
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-binary-utilities Author: Chen Zheng (chenzheng1030) Changessuggested in review of #69553 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72232.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.h
index 63064abb4d3c322..e3b91961d636c52 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.h
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ class XCOFFSymbolRef : public SymbolRef {
}
Expected<StringRef> getName() const;
- bool isFunction() const;
+ Expected<bool> isFunction() const;
bool isCsectSymbol() const;
Expected<XCOFFCsectAuxRef> getXCOFFCsectAuxRef() const;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.cpp b/llvm/lib/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.cpp
index 4c192aa37a7ecc7..9b2bc2cffc4a2fb 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.cpp
@@ -299,7 +299,11 @@ Expected<SymbolRef::Type>
XCOFFObjectFile::getSymbolType(DataRefImpl Symb) const {
XCOFFSymbolRef XCOFFSym = toSymbolRef(Symb);
- if (XCOFFSym.isFunction())
+ Expected<bool> IsFunction = XCOFFSym.isFunction();
+ if (Error E = IsFunction.takeError())
+ return std::move(E);
+
+ if (*IsFunction)
return SymbolRef::ST_Function;
if (XCOFF::C_FILE == XCOFFSym.getStorageClass())
@@ -1225,7 +1229,7 @@ std::optional<StringRef> XCOFFObjectFile::tryGetCPUName() const {
return StringRef("future");
}
-bool XCOFFSymbolRef::isFunction() const {
+Expected<bool> XCOFFSymbolRef::isFunction() const {
if (!isCsectSymbol())
return false;
@@ -1233,12 +1237,8 @@ bool XCOFFSymbolRef::isFunction() const {
return true;
Expected<XCOFFCsectAuxRef> ExpCsectAuxEnt = getXCOFFCsectAuxRef();
- if (!ExpCsectAuxEnt) {
- // If we could not get the CSECT auxiliary entry, then treat this symbol as
- // if it isn't a function. Consume the error and return `false` to move on.
- consumeError(ExpCsectAuxEnt.takeError());
- return false;
- }
+ if (Error E = ExpCsectAuxEnt.takeError())
+ return std::move(E);
const XCOFFCsectAuxRef CsectAuxRef = ExpCsectAuxEnt.get();
@@ -1253,12 +1253,8 @@ bool XCOFFSymbolRef::isFunction() const {
const int16_t SectNum = getSectionNumber();
Expected<DataRefImpl> SI = getObject()->getSectionByNum(SectNum);
- if (!SI) {
- // If we could not get the section, then this symbol should not be
- // a function. So consume the error and return `false` to move on.
- consumeError(SI.takeError());
- return false;
- }
+ if (Error E = SI.takeError())
+ return std::move(E);
return (getObject()->getSectionFlags(SI.get()) & XCOFF::STYP_TEXT);
}
|
llvm/lib/Object/XCOFFObjectFile.cpp
Outdated
consumeError(SI.takeError()); | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
if (Error E = SI.takeError()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ditto
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
suggested in review of llvm#69553 This is actually not an NFC as isFunction() does not return false for some "invalid" object, instead it returns the errors to its caller. But since there is no such invalid object in the LIT tests, so no case changes.
Local branch amd-gfx 8cdc496 Merged main:beb702c0ad69 into amd-gfx:70925faeed6a Remote branch main 1f6eb3c [XCOFF]refactor isFunction, NFC (llvm#72232)
suggested in review of #69553
This is actually not an NFC as isFunction() does not return false for some "invalid" object, instead it returns the errors to its caller. But since there is no such invalid object in the LIT tests, so no case changes.