Skip to content

[X86] Fix optmasks handling for AVX10.1-256 #73074

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
35 changes: 14 additions & 21 deletions llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86DomainReassignment.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -662,37 +662,30 @@ void X86DomainReassignment::initConverters() {

if (STI->hasBWI()) {
createReplacer(X86::MOV32rm, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVDkm_EVEX : X86::KMOVDkm);
createReplacer(X86::MOV64rm, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkm_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkm);

createReplacer(X86::MOV32mr, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVDmk_EVEX : X86::KMOVDmk);
createReplacer(X86::MOV64mr, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQmk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQmk);

createReplacer(X86::MOV32rr, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVDkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVDkk);
createReplacer(X86::MOV64rr, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkk);

createReplacer(X86::SHR32ri, X86::KSHIFTRDri);
createReplacer(X86::SHR64ri, X86::KSHIFTRQri);

createReplacer(X86::SHL32ri, X86::KSHIFTLDri);
createReplacer(X86::SHL64ri, X86::KSHIFTLQri);

createReplacer(X86::ADD32rr, X86::KADDDrr);
createReplacer(X86::ADD64rr, X86::KADDQrr);

createReplacer(X86::NOT32r, X86::KNOTDrr);
createReplacer(X86::NOT64r, X86::KNOTQrr);

createReplacer(X86::OR32rr, X86::KORDrr);
createReplacer(X86::OR64rr, X86::KORQrr);

createReplacer(X86::AND32rr, X86::KANDDrr);
createReplacer(X86::AND64rr, X86::KANDQrr);

createReplacer(X86::ANDN32rr, X86::KANDNDrr);
createReplacer(X86::ANDN64rr, X86::KANDNQrr);

createReplacer(X86::XOR32rr, X86::KXORDrr);
createReplacer(X86::XOR64rr, X86::KXORQrr);

if (STI->hasEVEX512()) {
createReplacer(X86::MOV64rm, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkm_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkm);
createReplacer(X86::MOV64mr, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQmk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQmk);
createReplacer(X86::MOV64rr, HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkk);
createReplacer(X86::SHR64ri, X86::KSHIFTRQri);
createReplacer(X86::SHL64ri, X86::KSHIFTLQri);
createReplacer(X86::ADD64rr, X86::KADDQrr);
createReplacer(X86::NOT64r, X86::KNOTQrr);
createReplacer(X86::OR64rr, X86::KORQrr);
createReplacer(X86::AND64rr, X86::KANDQrr);
createReplacer(X86::ANDN64rr, X86::KANDNQrr);
createReplacer(X86::XOR64rr, X86::KXORQrr);
}

// TODO: KTEST is not a replacement for TEST due to flag differences. Need
// to prove only Z flag is used.
Expand Down
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2058,9 +2058,12 @@ X86TargetLowering::X86TargetLowering(const X86TargetMachine &TM,
// AVX512BW..
if (!Subtarget.useSoftFloat() && Subtarget.hasBWI()) {
addRegisterClass(MVT::v32i1, &X86::VK32RegClass);
addRegisterClass(MVT::v64i1, &X86::VK64RegClass);
if (Subtarget.hasEVEX512())
addRegisterClass(MVT::v64i1, &X86::VK64RegClass);

for (auto VT : { MVT::v32i1, MVT::v64i1 }) {
if (VT == MVT::v64i1 && !Subtarget.hasEVEX512())
continue;
setOperationAction(ISD::VSELECT, VT, Expand);
setOperationAction(ISD::TRUNCATE, VT, Custom);
setOperationAction(ISD::SETCC, VT, Custom);
Expand Down
16 changes: 10 additions & 6 deletions llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3996,7 +3996,8 @@ static unsigned CopyToFromAsymmetricReg(unsigned DestReg, unsigned SrcReg,
// anyone.
if (X86::VK16RegClass.contains(SrcReg)) {
if (X86::GR64RegClass.contains(DestReg)) {
assert(Subtarget.hasBWI());
assert(Subtarget.hasBWI() && Subtarget.hasEVEX512() &&
"KMOVQ requires BWI with EVEX512");
return HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQrk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQrk;
}
if (X86::GR32RegClass.contains(DestReg))
Expand All @@ -4011,7 +4012,8 @@ static unsigned CopyToFromAsymmetricReg(unsigned DestReg, unsigned SrcReg,
// anyone.
if (X86::VK16RegClass.contains(DestReg)) {
if (X86::GR64RegClass.contains(SrcReg)) {
assert(Subtarget.hasBWI());
assert(Subtarget.hasBWI() && Subtarget.hasEVEX512() &&
"KMOVQ requires BWI with EVEX512");
return HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkr_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkr;
}
if (X86::GR32RegClass.contains(SrcReg))
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4125,8 +4127,9 @@ void X86InstrInfo::copyPhysReg(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
// All KMASK RegClasses hold the same k registers, can be tested against
// anyone.
else if (X86::VK16RegClass.contains(DestReg, SrcReg))
Opc = Subtarget.hasBWI() ? (HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkk)
: (HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVWkk);
Opc = Subtarget.hasBWI() && Subtarget.hasEVEX512()
? (HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkk)
: (HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkk_EVEX : X86::KMOVWkk);
if (!Opc)
Opc = CopyToFromAsymmetricReg(DestReg, SrcReg, Subtarget);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4247,7 +4250,8 @@ static unsigned getLoadStoreRegOpcode(Register Reg,
if (X86::RFP64RegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC))
return Load ? X86::LD_Fp64m : X86::ST_Fp64m;
if (X86::VK64RegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)) {
assert(STI.hasBWI() && "KMOVQ requires BWI");
assert(STI.hasBWI() && STI.hasEVEX512() &&
"KMOVQ requires BWI with EVEX512");
return Load ? (HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQkm_EVEX : X86::KMOVQkm)
: (HasEGPR ? X86::KMOVQmk_EVEX : X86::KMOVQmk);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -10523,7 +10527,7 @@ void X86InstrInfo::buildClearRegister(Register Reg, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
return;

// KXOR is safe to use because it doesn't affect flags.
unsigned Op = ST.hasBWI() ? X86::KXORQrr : X86::KXORWrr;
unsigned Op = ST.hasBWI() && ST.hasEVEX512() ? X86::KXORQrr : X86::KXORWrr;
BuildMI(MBB, Iter, DL, get(Op), Reg)
.addReg(Reg, RegState::Undef)
.addReg(Reg, RegState::Undef);
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ class X86Subtarget final : public X86GenSubtargetInfo {
// TODO: Currently we're always allowing widening on CPUs without VLX,
// because for many cases we don't have a better option.
bool canExtendTo512DQ() const {
return hasAVX512() && (!hasVLX() || getPreferVectorWidth() >= 512);
return hasAVX512() && (!hasVLX() || getPreferVectorWidth() >= 512) &&
hasEVEX512();
}
bool canExtendTo512BW() const {
return hasBWI() && canExtendTo512DQ();
Expand Down
Loading