-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[Flang][OpenMP] Prevent ICE for certain constructs in unnamed programs #73938
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
! RUN: %python %S/../test_errors.py %s %flang_fc1 -fopenmp | ||
! Check OpenMP compatibility with the DEC STRUCTURE extension | ||
|
||
structure /s/ | ||
end structure | ||
|
||
end |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does this fix the bug? Wouldn't it still fail when presented with a list or vector or tuple of parse tree nodes with a single element that would fail without this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function is only called for
MainProgram
,FunctionSubprogram
,SubroutineSubprogram
andBlockData
(seeResolveOmpTopLevelParts
in the same file). It tries to get the scope associated to these nodes and crashes while doing so in certain situations when it is a namelessMainProgram
. As far as I can tell, the issue is that, when the optionalProgramStmt
is not present (nameless program) the call toGetSource
will return the source object of the first sourced PFT node that appears in the program, which may not have a scope associated.In my opinion, it is incorrect to return the scope associated to any inner constructs when querying the program itself. This change makes it so the END statement of the program/function/subroutine/block, which is always present, is picked up every time, preventing this problem and stopping the crash from happening.
Maybe it'd be good to possibly restrict the
GetScope
function so it fails to compile if we pass any unexpected PFT node type, or just add a comment to describe its intended use. I'll gladly do it if that helps, or if there are any other suggestions as to how to deal with this case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this sound like a reasonable solution? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ping @klausler, I'd appreciate it if you could let me know whether my previous explanation addresses your concerns. Thanks for your time!