[flang][runtime] Don't use endfile record number for EOF detection on… #74640
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… input
The current EOF detection method (IsAtEOF()) depends on comparing the current record number with the record number of the endfile record, if it is known, which it is for units that have been written and then rewound for input. For formatted input, this is wrong in the case of a unit written with in-band newline characters. Rather than scan output data to count newlines, it's best to just organically determine EOF by detecting a failed or short read(), as we would have done anyway had the endfile record number not been known. (I considered resetting the endfile record number at the point of a REWIND, but not all rewinds are followed by input; it seems wiser to defer the resetting until an actual READ takes place.)
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/backslash_2.f90