-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang] Accept recursive non-dependent calls to functions with deduced return type #75456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be great to add a test that this is rejected without the previous line
retuen node;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added the test.
A note here is that It will only be rejected if the function instantiated because clang doesn't take into account return statements if the function is templated due to this part:
llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
Line 3806 in 1127656
gcc rejects even if the function is not instantiated. msvc doesn't. https://compiler-explorer.com/z/hGc8M1esT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's fine, and it's what I expected. While we could try to reject in the template definition if we see a recursive call prior to the end of the first
return
statement, I don't think it's worth the added complexity.I think what GCC's doing here is that it's treating the recursive call as dependent in much the same way that Clang does with this patch, but then performing an instantiation of the function template specialization
parseMulExpr<Node*>
after it finishes processing the template definition -- so it's also not eagerly diagnosing the problem. (Clang suppresses performing recursive non-dependent function template instantiations until the template has a point of instantiation outside itself, which GCC doesn't seem to do.) But I could be wrong.