-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[Concepts] Avoid substituting into constraints for invalid TemplateDecls #75697
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Fixes llvm#73885. Substituting into constraints for invalid TemplateDecls might still yield dependent expressions and end up crashing later while attempting evaluation.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217) ChangesFixes #73885. Substituting into constraints for invalid TemplateDecls might still yield dependent expressions and end up crashing later while attempting evaluation. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75697.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index b4b5352a306c1c..83f98b97925250 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -831,6 +831,9 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
- Fix crash when parsing nested requirement. Fixes:
(`#73112 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/73112>`_)
+- Fixed a crash when substituting into constraint expressions for invalid variable templates.
+ Fixes: (`#73885 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/73885>`_)
+
Bug Fixes to AST Handling
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Fixed an import failure of recursive friend class template.
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
index 719c6aab74e017..73683fee7c1487 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
@@ -353,6 +353,10 @@ static ExprResult calculateConstraintSatisfaction(
if (Inst.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
+ // An empty expression for substitution failure messages.
+ if (Template && Template->isInvalidDecl())
+ return ExprEmpty();
+
llvm::FoldingSetNodeID ID;
if (Template &&
DiagRecursiveConstraintEval(S, ID, Template, AtomicExpr, MLTAL)) {
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-expr.cpp b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-expr.cpp
index ba82fc1313fc95..fb4127182d1cb6 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-expr.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-expr.cpp
@@ -227,3 +227,13 @@ struct r6 {};
using r6i = r6<int>;
// expected-error@-1 {{constraints not satisfied for class template 'r6' [with T = int]}}
+
+namespace GH73885 {
+template <typename T> // expected-error {{extraneous template parameter list}}
+template <typename T> // expected-error {{'T' shadows template parameter}}
+ // expected-note@-2 {{template parameter is declared here}}
+requires(T{})
+T e_v;
+double e = e_v<double>;
+// expected-error@-1 {{constraints not satisfied for variable template 'e_v' [with T = double]}}
+}
|
@zyn0217 This fell under the cracks, I'm sorry. |
Hmmm, actually I'm thinking about whether we can move the check to somewhere in Parser so that these don't end up in the evaluation function. |
@cor3ntin I moved the check to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo comments
template <> // expected-warning {{extraneous}} | ||
template <class T> requires(T{true}) | ||
constexpr bool e = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really?
This is... wild. Is that intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is brought by 6591149, which I think is inappropriate nowadays but we probably need to keep it for ... historical reasons?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should remove test that is unrelated to the issue.
Would you mind creating a new issue for this behavior? Clang is being peculiar https://compiler-explorer.com/z/TcPGjWMGM - I think we should reconsider
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'd love to. Wait a minute.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(And thanks for the review.) |
…plateDecls (#75697) Summary: Fixes #73885. Substituting into constraints for invalid TemplateDecls might still yield dependent expressions and end up crashing later in evaluation. Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: https://phabricator.intern.facebook.com/D60250965
Fixes #73885.
Substituting into constraints for invalid TemplateDecls might still yield dependent expressions and end up crashing later while attempting evaluation.