-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[DebugInfo] Fix #76058: missing debug location in processSDiv function #76118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DebugInfo] Fix #76058: missing debug location in processSDiv function #76118
Conversation
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Shan Huang (Apochens) ChangesThis PR fixes #76058 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76118.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
index d2dfc764d042bb..c44d3748a80d8b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
@@ -935,11 +935,13 @@ static bool processSDiv(BinaryOperator *SDI, const ConstantRange &LCR,
UDiv->setDebugLoc(SDI->getDebugLoc());
UDiv->setIsExact(SDI->isExact());
- Value *Res = UDiv;
+ auto *Res = UDiv;
// If the operands had two different domains, we need to negate the result.
- if (Ops[0].D != Ops[1].D)
+ if (Ops[0].D != Ops[1].D) {
Res = BinaryOperator::CreateNeg(Res, Res->getName() + ".neg", SDI);
+ Res->setDebugLoc(SDI->getDebugLoc());
+ }
SDI->replaceAllUsesWith(Res);
SDI->eraseFromParent();
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/sdiv_missing_debugloc.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/sdiv_missing_debugloc.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..523f58f9872882
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/sdiv_missing_debugloc.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+; RUN: opt -passes=correlated-propagation -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+; CHECK: %{{[a-zA-Z0-9_]*}} = udiv i8 %x.nonneg, %y, !dbg ![[DBGLOC:[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: %{{[a-zA-Z0-9_]*}}.neg = sub i8 0, %rem1, !dbg ![[DBGLOC]]
+
+; ModuleID = 'reduced.ll'
+source_filename = "orig.ll"
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
+target triple = "thumbv7m-arm-none-eabi"
+
+; Function Attrs: inaccessiblememonly nocallback nofree nosync nounwind willreturn
+declare void @llvm.assume(i1 noundef) #0
+
+define void @test8_neg_neg(i8 %x, i8 %y) !dbg !5 {
+ %c0 = icmp sle i8 %x, 0, !dbg !13
+ call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i1 %c0, metadata !9, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !13
+ call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c0), !dbg !14
+ %c1 = icmp sge i8 %y, 0, !dbg !15
+ call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i1 %c1, metadata !11, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !15
+ call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c1), !dbg !16
+ %rem = sdiv i8 %x, %y, !dbg !17
+ call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i8 %rem, metadata !12, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !17
+ ret void, !dbg !18
+}
+
+; Function Attrs: nocallback nofree nosync nounwind readnone speculatable willreturn
+declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1
+
+!llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
+!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
+!llvm.debugify = !{!3, !4}
+
+!0 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
+!1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C, file: !2, producer: "debugify", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug)
+!2 = !DIFile(filename: "reduced.ll", directory: "/")
+!3 = !{i32 6}
+!4 = !{i32 3}
+!5 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test8_neg_neg", linkageName: "test8_neg_neg", scope: null, file: !2, line: 1, type: !6, scopeLine: 1, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagOptimized, unit: !1, retainedNodes: !8)
+!6 = !DISubroutineType(types: !7)
+!7 = !{}
+!8 = !{!9, !11, !12}
+!9 = !DILocalVariable(name: "1", scope: !5, file: !2, line: 1, type: !10)
+!10 = !DIBasicType(name: "ty8", size: 8, encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned)
+!11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "2", scope: !5, file: !2, line: 3, type: !10)
+!12 = !DILocalVariable(name: "3", scope: !5, file: !2, line: 5, type: !10)
+!13 = !DILocation(line: 1, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!15 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!16 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!17 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!18 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 1, scope: !5)
\ No newline at end of file
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine, some test nits.
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ | |||
; RUN: opt -passes=correlated-propagation -S < %s | FileCheck %s | |||
; CHECK: %{{[a-zA-Z0-9_]*}} = udiv i8 %x.nonneg, %y, !dbg ![[DBGLOC:[0-9]+]] | |||
; CHECK-NEXT: %{{[a-zA-Z0-9_]*}}.neg = sub i8 0, %rem1, !dbg ![[DBGLOC]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please move these check lines lower (e.g. directly above the function).
llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/sdiv_missing_debugloc.ll
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/sdiv_missing_debugloc.ll
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi, Nikita! To refine the testcase, I (1) removed line 5-8, moving the check lines directly above the function, and (2) discarded the llvm.debugify metadata (since it's not necessary). After the refinement, I tested the patch on this testcase, and It does work. Could you please review this PR again to check whether there is any other issue? Thanks. |
This PR fixes #76058