Skip to content

[AMDGPU] SILowerSGPRSpills: do not update MRI reserve registers #77888

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 0 additions & 9 deletions llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SILowerSGPRSpills.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ bool SILowerSGPRSpills::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
}

bool MadeChange = false;
bool NewReservedRegs = false;
bool SpilledToVirtVGPRLanes = false;

// TODO: CSR VGPRs will never be spilled to AGPRs. These can probably be
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -370,7 +369,6 @@ bool SILowerSGPRSpills::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
// intermediate spills is implemented. There is no such support
// currently exist in the LLVM compiler.
if (FuncInfo->allocateSGPRSpillToVGPRLane(MF, FI, true)) {
NewReservedRegs = true;
bool Spilled = TRI->eliminateSGPRToVGPRSpillFrameIndex(
MI, FI, nullptr, Indexes, LIS, true);
if (!Spilled)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -442,12 +440,5 @@ bool SILowerSGPRSpills::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
SaveBlocks.clear();
RestoreBlocks.clear();

// Updated the reserved registers with any physical VGPRs added for SGPR
Copy link
Collaborator

@cdevadas cdevadas Jan 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The phys VGPRs used for CSR SGPR spilling shouldn't be reused during SIPreAllocateWWMRegs.
I hope they will be marked reserved while getting the AllocationOrder from RegClassInfo.runOnMachineFunction(MF).
@arsenm any specific reason they are marked Reserved here explicitly?

// spills.
if (NewReservedRegs) {
for (Register Reg : FuncInfo->getWWMReservedRegs())
MRI.reserveReg(Reg, TRI);
}

return MadeChange;
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-unknown-amdpal -mcpu=gfx1030 -start-before=si-lower-sgpr-spills -stop-after=prologepilog -verify-machineinstrs --stress-regalloc=2 -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix GCN %s
# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-unknown-amdpal -mcpu=gfx1030 -start-before=si-lower-sgpr-spills -stop-after=prologepilog -verify-machineinstrs --stress-regalloc=5 -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix GCN %s
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To explain this test change:
--stress-regalloc=2 limits the VGPR class to 2 registers after reserve registers are subtracted.
Without reservation by SILowerSGPRSpills the 3 VGPRs count against the VGPR class usage, so the class size must be enlarged (to 5) to accommodate them.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To preempt an obvious follow up question: "how does SILowerSGPRSpill exceed the register limit?"
allocateSGPRSpillToVGPRLane uses findUnusedRegister which does not consult the allocation in RegisterClassInfo which imposes the limit.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This option should have been better integrated into MRI to fully limit the register usage in various other passes.


--- |
define amdgpu_gfx [13 x i32] @test_main() #0 {
Expand Down