-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[MLIR][Tensor,MemRef] Fold expand_shape and collapse_shape if identity #80658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MLIR][Tensor,MemRef] Fold expand_shape and collapse_shape if identity #80658
Conversation
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-tensor @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: James Newling (newling) ChangesBefore: op verifiers failed if the input and output ranks were the same (i.e. no expansion or collapse). This behaviour requires users of these shape ops to verify manually that they are not creating identity versions of these ops every time they build them -- problematic. This PR removes this strict verification, and introduces folders for the the identity cases. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80658.diff 7 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Utils/ReshapeOpsUtils.h b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Utils/ReshapeOpsUtils.h
index 61c929dee0f27..3a672a1cc6060 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Utils/ReshapeOpsUtils.h
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Utils/ReshapeOpsUtils.h
@@ -111,8 +111,6 @@ static LogicalResult verifyReshapeLikeTypes(Op op, T expandedType,
<< " to have higher rank than the type = " << collapsedType;
if (expandedRank == 0)
return op.emitOpError("expected non-zero memref ranks");
- if (expandedRank == collapsedRank)
- return op.emitOpError("expected to collapse or expand dims");
if (collapsedRank == 0) {
// If collapsed rank is 0, then expanded type must be static shaped and of
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefOps.cpp
index b79ab8f3d671e..b79022d675bd6 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefOps.cpp
@@ -2223,10 +2223,6 @@ LogicalResult ExpandShapeOp::verify() {
MemRefType srcType = getSrcType();
MemRefType resultType = getResultType();
- if (srcType.getRank() >= resultType.getRank())
- return emitOpError("expected rank expansion, but found source rank ")
- << srcType.getRank() << " >= result rank " << resultType.getRank();
-
// Verify result shape.
if (failed(verifyCollapsedShape(getOperation(), srcType.getShape(),
resultType.getShape(),
@@ -2377,10 +2373,6 @@ LogicalResult CollapseShapeOp::verify() {
MemRefType srcType = getSrcType();
MemRefType resultType = getResultType();
- if (srcType.getRank() <= resultType.getRank())
- return emitOpError("expected rank reduction, but found source rank ")
- << srcType.getRank() << " <= result rank " << resultType.getRank();
-
// Verify result shape.
if (failed(verifyCollapsedShape(getOperation(), resultType.getShape(),
srcType.getShape(), getReassociationIndices(),
@@ -2455,11 +2447,15 @@ void CollapseShapeOp::getCanonicalizationPatterns(RewritePatternSet &results,
}
OpFoldResult ExpandShapeOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (getSrcType() == getType())
+ return getSrc();
return foldReshapeOp<ExpandShapeOp, CollapseShapeOp>(*this,
adaptor.getOperands());
}
OpFoldResult CollapseShapeOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (getSrcType() == getType())
+ return getSrc();
return foldReshapeOp<CollapseShapeOp, ExpandShapeOp>(*this,
adaptor.getOperands());
}
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Tensor/IR/TensorOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Tensor/IR/TensorOps.cpp
index b2fe58099b2fb..591cbcde80084 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Tensor/IR/TensorOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Tensor/IR/TensorOps.cpp
@@ -1656,22 +1656,10 @@ static LogicalResult verifyTensorReshapeOp(TensorReshapeOp op,
}
LogicalResult ExpandShapeOp::verify() {
- auto srcType = getSrcType();
- auto resultType = getResultType();
- if (srcType.getRank() >= resultType.getRank())
- return emitOpError("expected rank expansion, but found source rank ")
- << srcType.getRank() << " >= result rank " << resultType.getRank();
-
return verifyTensorReshapeOp(*this, getResultType(), getSrcType());
}
LogicalResult CollapseShapeOp::verify() {
- auto srcType = getSrcType();
- auto resultType = getResultType();
- if (srcType.getRank() <= resultType.getRank())
- return emitOpError("expected rank reduction, but found source rank ")
- << srcType.getRank() << " <= result rank " << resultType.getRank();
-
return verifyTensorReshapeOp(*this, getSrcType(), getResultType());
}
@@ -1872,11 +1860,15 @@ void CollapseShapeOp::getCanonicalizationPatterns(RewritePatternSet &results,
}
OpFoldResult ExpandShapeOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (getSrcType() == getType())
+ return getSrc();
return foldReshapeOp<ExpandShapeOp, CollapseShapeOp>(*this,
adaptor.getOperands());
}
OpFoldResult CollapseShapeOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (getSrcType() == getType())
+ return getSrc();
return foldReshapeOp<CollapseShapeOp, ExpandShapeOp>(*this,
adaptor.getOperands());
}
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/canonicalize.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/canonicalize.mlir
index eccfc485b2034..8c0b765c1b123 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/canonicalize.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/canonicalize.mlir
@@ -1,5 +1,24 @@
// RUN: mlir-opt %s -canonicalize="test-convergence" --split-input-file -allow-unregistered-dialect | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: collapse_shape_identity_fold
+// CHECK-NEXT: return
+func.func @collapse_shape_identity_fold(%arg0 : memref<5xi8>) -> memref<5xi8> {
+ %0 = memref.collapse_shape %arg0 [[0]] : memref<5xi8> into memref<5xi8>
+ return %0 : memref<5xi8>
+}
+
+// -----
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: expand_shape_identity_fold
+// CHECK-NEXT: return
+func.func @expand_shape_identity_fold(%arg0 : memref<5x4xi8>) -> memref<5x4xi8> {
+ %0 = memref.expand_shape %arg0 [[0], [1]] : memref<5x4xi8> into memref<5x4xi8>
+ return %0 : memref<5x4xi8>
+}
+
+// -----
+
// CHECK-LABEL: func @subview_of_size_memcast
// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.[a-z0-9A-Z_]+]]: memref<4x6x16x32xi8>
// CHECK: %[[S:.+]] = memref.subview %[[ARG0]][0, 1, 0, 0] [1, 1, 16, 32] [1, 1, 1, 1] : memref<4x6x16x32xi8> to memref<16x32xi8, strided{{.*}}>
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/invalid.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/invalid.mlir
index 7bb7a2affcbd1..53841fa836da7 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/invalid.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/MemRef/invalid.mlir
@@ -415,20 +415,6 @@ func.func @collapse_shape_out_of_bounds(%arg0: memref<?x?xf32>) {
// -----
-func.func @expand_shape_invalid_ranks(%arg0: memref<?x?xf32>) {
- // expected-error @+1 {{op expected rank expansion, but found source rank 2 >= result rank 2}}
- %0 = memref.expand_shape %arg0 [[0], [1]] : memref<?x?xf32> into memref<?x?xf32>
-}
-
-// -----
-
-func.func @collapse_shape_invalid_ranks(%arg0: memref<?x?xf32>) {
- // expected-error @+1 {{op expected rank reduction, but found source rank 2 <= result rank 2}}
- %0 = memref.collapse_shape %arg0 [[0], [1]] : memref<?x?xf32> into memref<?x?xf32>
-}
-
-// -----
-
func.func @expand_shape_out_of_bounds(%arg0: memref<?xf32>) {
// expected-error @+1 {{op reassociation index 2 is out of bounds}}
%0 = memref.expand_shape %arg0 [[0, 1, 2]] : memref<?xf32> into memref<4x?xf32>
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/canonicalize.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/canonicalize.mlir
index ed964071358ac..9b31d858d63c5 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/canonicalize.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/canonicalize.mlir
@@ -1,5 +1,24 @@
// RUN: mlir-opt %s -split-input-file -canonicalize="test-convergence" | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: expand_shape_identity_fold
+// CHECK-NEXT: return
+func.func @expand_shape_identity_fold(%arg0 : tensor<5xf32>) -> tensor<5xf32> {
+ %0 = tensor.expand_shape %arg0 [[0]] : tensor<5xf32> into tensor<5xf32>
+ return %0 : tensor<5xf32>
+}
+
+// -----
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: collapse_shape_identity_fold
+// CHECK-NEXT: return
+func.func @collapse_shape_identity_fold(%arg0 : tensor<5x4xf32>) -> tensor<5x4xf32> {
+ %0 = tensor.collapse_shape %arg0 [[0], [1]] : tensor<5x4xf32> into tensor<5x4xf32>
+ return %0 : tensor<5x4xf32>
+}
+
+// -----
+
// CHECK-LABEL: @tensor_bitcast_chain_ok
// CHECK-SAME: %[[IN:.*]]: tensor<2xi32>
func.func @tensor_bitcast_chain_ok(%input: tensor<2xi32>) -> tensor<2xf32> {
@@ -1977,7 +1996,7 @@ func.func @unpack_pack(%t: tensor<128x128xf32>) -> tensor<128x128xf32> {
// Chain: NC -> NCnc -> NCnc -> NC
// CHECK: func.func @unpack_pack(
-// CHECK-SAME: %[[T:.+]]: tensor<128x128xf32>,
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[T:.+]]: tensor<128x128xf32>,
// CHECK: return %[[T]] : tensor<128x128xf32>
func.func @unpack_pack(%t: tensor<128x128xf32>, %tile1: index, %tile2: index) -> tensor<128x128xf32> {
%tensor_empty = tensor.empty(%tile1, %tile2) : tensor<16x16x?x?xf32>
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/invalid.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/invalid.mlir
index 735e5146e9dbc..39cd3788cb081 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/invalid.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/invalid.mlir
@@ -343,20 +343,6 @@ func.func @illegal_collapsing_reshape_mixed_tensor_2(%arg0 : tensor<?x4x5xf32>)
// -----
-func.func @expand_shape_invalid_ranks(%arg0: tensor<?x?xf32>) {
- // expected-error @+1 {{op expected rank expansion, but found source rank 2 >= result rank 2}}
- %0 = tensor.expand_shape %arg0 [[0], [1]] : tensor<?x?xf32> into tensor<?x?xf32>
-}
-
-// -----
-
-func.func @collapse_shape_invalid_ranks(%arg0: tensor<?x?xf32>) {
- // expected-error @+1 {{op expected rank reduction, but found source rank 2 <= result rank 2}}
- %0 = tensor.collapse_shape %arg0 [[0], [1]] : tensor<?x?xf32> into tensor<?x?xf32>
-}
-
-// -----
-
func.func @rank(%0: f32) {
// expected-error@+1 {{'tensor.rank' op operand #0 must be tensor of any type values}}
"tensor.rank"(%0): (f32)->index
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Allowing identity expansions/collapsion (and folding them) makes sense to me. Interestingly, I have seen this pattern (disallowing "identity" ops) in other places. E.g., certain "cast" ops that do not change the type fail verification.
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
Ping |
@nicolasvasilache and @matthias-springer please let me know if you can review this, else I can ask someone else |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay
5da6330
to
1a09fd9
Compare
1a09fd9
to
e9088b0
Compare
Finally made it through CI. @matthias-springer I don't have write access to this repo. Would you mind merging this PR for me? |
@newling Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
Before: op verifiers failed if the input and output ranks were the same (i.e. no expansion or collapse). This behavior requires users of these shape ops to verify manually that they are not creating identity versions of these ops every time they build them -- problematic. This PR removes this strict verification, and introduces folders for the the identity cases.
The PR also removes the special case handling of rank-0 tensors for expand_shape and collapse_shape, there doesn't seem to be any reason to treat them differently.