Skip to content

[mlir][spirv] Handle a missing case when inlining spirv.ReturnValue #80733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

agentcooper
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #73285.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write
permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by
name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review
by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate
is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 5, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-spirv

Author: Artem Tyurin (agentcooper)

Changes

Fixes #73285.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80733.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVDialect.cpp (+3-1)
  • (modified) mlir/test/Dialect/SPIRV/Transforms/inlining.mlir (+22)
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVDialect.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVDialect.cpp
index db26fa81790d19..e914f46bdef643 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVDialect.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVDialect.cpp
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ struct SPIRVInlinerInterface : public DialectInlinerInterface {
       OpBuilder(op).create<spirv::BranchOp>(op->getLoc(), newDest);
       op->erase();
     } else if (auto retValOp = dyn_cast<spirv::ReturnValueOp>(op)) {
-      llvm_unreachable("unimplemented spirv.ReturnValue in inliner");
+      OpBuilder(op).create<spirv::BranchOp>(retValOp->getLoc(), newDest,
+                                            retValOp->getOperands());
+      op->erase();
     }
   }
 
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/SPIRV/Transforms/inlining.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/SPIRV/Transforms/inlining.mlir
index 8d663b4edc4527..3aadb19ec15829 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/SPIRV/Transforms/inlining.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/SPIRV/Transforms/inlining.mlir
@@ -224,5 +224,27 @@ spirv.module Logical GLSL450 {
   spirv.ExecutionMode @inline_into_selection_region "LocalSize", 32, 1, 1
 }
 
+// -----
+
+spirv.module Logical GLSL450 {
+  // CHECK-LABEL: @foo
+  spirv.func @foo(%arg0: i32) -> i32 "None" {
+    // CHECK-NOT: spirv.FunctionCall
+    // CHECK-NEXT: spirv.Constant 1
+    %res = spirv.FunctionCall @bar(%arg0) : (i32) -> i32
+    spirv.ReturnValue %res : i32
+  }
+
+  spirv.func @bar(%arg1: i32) -> i32 "None" attributes {sym_visibility = "private"} {
+    %cst1_i32 = spirv.Constant 1 : i32
+    %0 = spirv.IEqual %arg1, %cst1_i32 : i32
+    spirv.BranchConditional %0, ^bb1(%cst1_i32 : i32), ^bb2
+  ^bb1(%1: i32):
+    spirv.ReturnValue %1 : i32
+  ^bb2:
+    spirv.ReturnValue %cst1_i32 : i32
+  }
+}
+
 // TODO: Add tests for inlining structured control flow into
 // structured control flow.

@antiagainst antiagainst merged commit 9a5fb74 into llvm:main Feb 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

@agentcooper Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested
by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may recieve a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as
the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your
change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or
infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself.
This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[mlir] --inline crashed with assertion failure "UNREACHABLE"
3 participants