-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang-tidy] Add fix-its to readability-avoid-return-with-void-value
check
#81420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
SimplyDanny
merged 5 commits into
llvm:main
from
SimplyDanny:avoid-return-with-void-value-fixits
Apr 7, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4b7d4a4
[clang-tidy] Add fix-its to `avoid-return-with-void-value` check
SimplyDanny ebeefa6
Omit blocks for single statements
SimplyDanny 3d36f81
Use findNextTerminator
SimplyDanny 1571389
Reuse logic from existing check to insert braces around statements
SimplyDanny 91db7ba
Avoid blank return when statement is last in a function body
SimplyDanny File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @SimplyDanny, we are getting a static verifier hit on this code now since there is a nullptr check of SurroundingBlock followed by a use of SurroundingBlock without a check.
It seems when there is a function parent SurroundingBlock won't be a nullptr since it will be set to the function's CompoundStmt, but that's not completely obvious to the reader of the code.
You might consider adding an assert to make it clear for anyone modifying in the future. Maybe:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressing this in #90173.