-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[llvm-exegesis] Simplify validation event string conversion functions #82092
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
boomanaiden154
wants to merge
1
commit into
llvm:main
from
boomanaiden154:exegesis-refactor-string-conversion-functions
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about putting the name (e.g. "instructions-retired") in the tabledef
ValidationEvent
class ? This would avoid any kind of synchronization to have to be done manually.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked into doing that, but the way the Exegesis TableGen is setup, everything that gets TableGened ends up in a target-specific
ExegesisTarget
implementation. Moving it there naively would mean duplication across the targets and move this code somewhere where it makes less sense.We could probably make some TableGen/build system changes to get a target-independent
.inc
with this information, but that seemed excessive to me, unless I'm overthinking it and it's a lot simpler than that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. I'm not a big fan of having validation counter tables spread all over the place (enum, td files, flags, and now this table). Let me think it over.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a proposal in #82256