Skip to content

release/18.x: [SystemZ] Use VT (not ArgVT) for SlotVT in LowerCall(). (#82475) #83021

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

llvmbot
Copy link
Member

@llvmbot llvmbot commented Feb 26, 2024

Backport 9c0e45d

Requested by: @JonPsson1

@llvmbot llvmbot added this to the LLVM 18.X Release milestone Feb 26, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member Author

llvmbot commented Feb 26, 2024

@uweigand What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?

Copy link
Member

@uweigand uweigand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This should be backported as a fixes a regression with i128 support.

When an integer argument is promoted and *not* split (like i72 -> i128 on
a new machine with vector support), the SlotVT should be i128, which is
stored in VT - not ArgVT.

Fixes llvm#81417

(cherry picked from commit 9c0e45d)
@tstellar tstellar merged commit 9d51bd1 into llvm:release/18.x Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants