-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[mlir] Add result name for gpu.block_id and gpu.thread_id ops. #83393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-gpu @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: Alexander Belyaev (pifon2a) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83393.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/GPU/IR/GPUOps.td b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/GPU/IR/GPUOps.td
index 955dd1e20d2488..f38ef4d709ef44 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/GPU/IR/GPUOps.td
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/GPU/IR/GPUOps.td
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ include "mlir/IR/EnumAttr.td"
include "mlir/IR/SymbolInterfaces.td"
include "mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.td"
include "mlir/Interfaces/DataLayoutInterfaces.td"
+include "mlir/IR/OpAsmInterface.td"
include "mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.td"
include "mlir/Interfaces/InferIntRangeInterface.td"
include "mlir/Interfaces/InferTypeOpInterface.td"
@@ -50,9 +51,21 @@ def GPU_DimensionAttr : EnumAttr<GPU_Dialect, GPU_Dimension, "dim">;
class GPU_IndexOp<string mnemonic, list<Trait> traits = []> :
GPU_Op<mnemonic, !listconcat(traits, [
- Pure, DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<InferIntRangeInterface>])>,
+ Pure,
+ DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<InferIntRangeInterface>,
+ DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<OpAsmOpInterface, ["getAsmResultNames"]>])>,
Arguments<(ins GPU_DimensionAttr:$dimension)>, Results<(outs Index)> {
let assemblyFormat = "$dimension attr-dict";
+ let extraClassDefinition = [{
+ void $cppClass::getAsmResultNames(
+ llvm::function_ref<void(mlir::Value, mlir::StringRef)> setNameFn) {
+ auto dimStr = stringifyDimension(getDimensionAttr().getValue());
+ auto opName = getOperationName();
+ assert(opName.consume_front("gpu."));
+ SmallString<8> resultName({opName, "_", dimStr});
+ setNameFn(getResult(),resultName);
+ }
+ }];
}
def GPU_ClusterDimOp : GPU_IndexOp<"cluster_dim"> {
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/GPU/ops.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/GPU/ops.mlir
index 8d249c9e9b9b8a..511b018877476f 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/GPU/ops.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/GPU/ops.mlir
@@ -59,24 +59,39 @@ module attributes {gpu.container_module} {
gpu.module @kernels {
gpu.func @kernel_1(%arg0 : f32, %arg1 : memref<?xf32, 1>) kernel {
%tIdX = gpu.thread_id x
+ // CHECK: thread_id_x
%tIdY = gpu.thread_id y
+ // CHECK-NEXT: thread_id_y
%tIdZ = gpu.thread_id z
+ // CHECK-NEXT: thread_id_z
%bDimX = gpu.block_dim x
+ // CHECK-NEXT: block_dim_x
%bDimY = gpu.block_dim y
+ // CHECK-NEXT: block_dim_y
%bDimZ = gpu.block_dim z
+ // CHECK-NEXT: block_dim_z
%bIdX = gpu.block_id x
+ // CHECK-NEXT: block_id_x
%bIdY = gpu.block_id y
+ // CHECK-NEXT: block_id_y
%bIdZ = gpu.block_id z
+ // CHECK-NEXT: block_id_z
%gDimX = gpu.grid_dim x
+ // CHECK-NEXT: grid_dim_x
%gDimY = gpu.grid_dim y
+ // CHECK-NEXT: grid_dim_y
%gDimZ = gpu.grid_dim z
+ // CHECK-NEXT: grid_dim_z
%gIdX = gpu.global_id x
+ // CHECK-NEXT: global_id_x
%gIdY = gpu.global_id y
+ // CHECK-NEXT: global_id_y
%gIdZ = gpu.global_id z
+ // CHECK-NEXT: global_id_z
%sgId = gpu.subgroup_id : index
%numSg = gpu.num_subgroups : index
|
f3ff7b4
to
0341193
Compare
llvm::function_ref<void(mlir::Value, mlir::StringRef)> setNameFn) { | ||
auto dimStr = stringifyDimension(getDimensionAttr().getValue()); | ||
auto opName = getOperationName(); | ||
assert(opName.consume_front("gpu.")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this changing the behavior between assert and release build?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, i thought it affects only llvm_assert. Actually, this assert is not really needed. I can remote it. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I would just remove the assert here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No description provided.