-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[libc++][NFC] Use __copy_cv to implement __apply_cv #86477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code formatter. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Nikolas Klauser (philnik777) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86477.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/apply_cv.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/apply_cv.h
index 7c6aabec8344b1..723af95b8d9280 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/apply_cv.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/apply_cv.h
@@ -10,9 +10,7 @@
#define _LIBCPP___TYPE_TRAITS_APPLY_CV_H
#include <__config>
-#include <__type_traits/is_const.h>
-#include <__type_traits/is_volatile.h>
-#include <__type_traits/remove_reference.h>
+#include <__type_traits/copy_cv.h>
#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
# pragma GCC system_header
@@ -20,54 +18,16 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-template <class _Tp,
- bool = is_const<__libcpp_remove_reference_t<_Tp> >::value,
- bool = is_volatile<__libcpp_remove_reference_t<_Tp> >::value>
-struct __apply_cv_impl {
- template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = _Up;
-};
-
template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp, true, false> {
- template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = const _Up;
-};
-
-template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp, false, true> {
- template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = volatile _Up;
-};
-
-template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp, true, true> {
- template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = const volatile _Up;
-};
-
-template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&, false, false> {
- template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = _Up&;
-};
-
-template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&, true, false> {
- template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = const _Up&;
-};
-
-template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&, false, true> {
+struct __apply_cv_impl {
template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = volatile _Up&;
+ using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __copy_cv_t<_Tp, _Up>;
};
template <class _Tp>
-struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&, true, true> {
+struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&> {
template <class _Up>
- using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = const volatile _Up&;
+ using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __copy_cv_t<_Tp, _Up>&;
};
template <class _Tp, class _Up>
|
}; | ||
|
||
template <class _Tp> | ||
struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&, true, true> { | ||
struct __apply_cv_impl<_Tp&> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An improvement to __copy_cv_ref_t
we could maybe do is
template <bool _Ref>
struct __copy_cv_ref_impl;
template <>
struct __copy_cv_ref_impl<true> {
template <class _Tp>
using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = _Tp&;
};
template <>
struct __copy_cv_ref_impl<false> {
template <class _Tp>
using __apply _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = _Tp;
};
template <class _Tp>
using __copy_cvref_t = typename __copy_cv_ref_impl<is_lvalue_reference_v<_Tp>>::template __apply<_Tp>;
No description provided.