Skip to content

[documentation] [mlir] DataLayout.md: fix broken link to DLTI dialect #86524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

ImanHosseini
Copy link
Contributor

The link to DLTI dialect was broken. @joker-eph

@llvmbot llvmbot added the mlir label Mar 25, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Mar 25, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

Author: Iman Hosseini (ImanHosseini)

Changes

The link to DLTI dialect was broken. @joker-eph


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86524.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/docs/DataLayout.md (+1-1)
diff --git a/mlir/docs/DataLayout.md b/mlir/docs/DataLayout.md
index 86ad51a517ae7d..2efe5e61a6c6f8 100644
--- a/mlir/docs/DataLayout.md
+++ b/mlir/docs/DataLayout.md
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ The default data layout assumes 8-bit bytes.
 
 ### DLTI Dialect
 
-The [DLTI](Dialects/DLTI.md) dialect provides the attributes implementing
+The [DLTI](https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/DLTIDialect/) dialect provides the attributes implementing
 `DataLayoutSpecInterface` and `DataLayoutEntryInterface`, as well as a dialect
 attribute that can be used to attach the specification to a given operation. The
 verifier of this attribute triggers those of the specification and checks the

Copy link

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

Copy link

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code formatter.

Applying suggestion to use relative path.
@joker-eph joker-eph merged commit bc02c08 into llvm:main Mar 25, 2024
@ImanHosseini ImanHosseini deleted the patch-2 branch June 10, 2024 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants