Skip to content

Update __cpp_concepts macro #87998

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ C++20 Feature Support
templates (`P1814R0 <https://wg21.link/p1814r0>`_).
(#GH54051).

- We have sufficient confidence and experience with the concepts implementation
to update the ``__cpp_concepts`` macro to `202002L`. This enables
``<expected>`` from libstdc++ to work correctly with Clang.

C++23 Feature Support
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Expand Down
5 changes: 1 addition & 4 deletions clang/lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -720,10 +720,7 @@ static void InitializeCPlusPlusFeatureTestMacros(const LangOptions &LangOpts,
if (LangOpts.CPlusPlus20) {
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_aggregate_paren_init", "201902L");

// P0848 is implemented, but we're still waiting for other concepts
// issues to be addressed before bumping __cpp_concepts up to 202002L.
// Refer to the discussion of this at https://reviews.llvm.org/D128619.
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_concepts", "201907L");
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_concepts", "202002");
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_conditional_explicit", "201806L");
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_consteval", "202211L");
Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_constexpr_dynamic_alloc", "201907L");
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion clang/test/Lexer/cxx-features.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
#error "wrong value for __cpp_char8_t"
#endif

#if check(concepts, 0, 0, 0, 0, 201907, 201907, 201907)
#if check(concepts, 0, 0, 0, 0, 202002, 202002, 202002)
#error "wrong value for __cpp_concepts"
#endif

Expand Down
12 changes: 2 additions & 10 deletions clang/www/cxx_status.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -544,16 +544,8 @@ <h2 id="cxx20">C++20 implementation status</h2>
</tr>
<tr> <!-- from Cologne -->
<td><a href="https://wg21.link/p0848r3">P0848R3</a></td>
<td rowspan="1" class="partial" align="center">
<details>
<summary>Clang 16 (Partial)</summary>
Because of other concepts implementation deficits, the __cpp_concepts macro is not yet set to 202002L.
Also, the related defect reports <a href="https://wg21.link/cwg1496">DR1496</a> and
<a href="https://wg21.link/cwg1734">DR1734</a> are not yet implemented. Accordingly, deleted
special member functions are treated as eligible even though they shouldn't be.
Comment on lines -551 to -553
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that not true any more?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those aren't implemented, and that IS true, but it is kind of orthogonal to concepts. Those issues pre-date concepts, and are only somewhat more visible thanks to concepts, but are not 'worse' nor 'caused' by it.

</details>
</td>
</tr>
<td rowspan="1" class="full" align="center">Clang 19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="https://wg21.link/p1616r1">P1616R1</a></td>
<td rowspan="2" class="full" align="center">Clang 10</td>
Expand Down