-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang][modules] Allow including module maps to be non-affecting #89992
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[clang][modules] Allow including module maps to be non-affecting #89992
Conversation
e16becb
to
6e77e37
Compare
f8d72a9
to
6d435c0
Compare
6d435c0
to
303b6f4
Compare
303b6f4
to
be0e507
Compare
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11) ChangesThe dependency scanner only puts top-level affecting module map files on the command line for explicitly building a module. This is done because any affecting child module map files should be referenced by the top-level one, meaning listing them explicitly does not have any meaning and only makes the command lines longer. However, a problem arises whenever the definition of an affecting module lives in a module map that is not top-level. Considering the rules explained above, such module map file would not make it to the command line. That's why 83973cf started marking the parents of an affecting module map file as affecting too. This way, the top-level file does make it into the command line. This can be problematic, though. On macOS, for example, the Darwin module lives in "/usr/include/Darwin.modulemap" one of many module map files included by "/usr/include/module.modulemap". Reporting the parent on the command line forces explicit builds to parse all the other module map files included by it, which is not necessary and can get expensive in terms of file system traffic. This patch solves that performance issue by stopping marking parent module map files as affecting, and marking module map files as top-level whenever they are top-level among the set of affecting files, not among the set of all known files. This means that the top-level "/usr/include/module.modulemap" is now not marked as affecting and "/usr/include/Darwin.modulemap" is. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89992.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h
index 6c45b7348b8552..247e7943a45bc9 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ class StoredDeclsList;
class SwitchCase;
class Token;
+namespace SrcMgr {
+class FileInfo;
+} // namespace SrcMgr
+
/// Writes an AST file containing the contents of a translation unit.
///
/// The ASTWriter class produces a bitstream containing the serialized
@@ -490,6 +494,11 @@ class ASTWriter : public ASTDeserializationListener,
/// during \c SourceManager serialization.
void computeNonAffectingInputFiles();
+ /// Some affecting files can be included from files that are not affecting.
+ /// This function erases source locations pointing into such files.
+ SourceLocation getAffectingIncludeLoc(const SourceManager &SourceMgr,
+ const SrcMgr::FileInfo &File);
+
/// Returns an adjusted \c FileID, accounting for any non-affecting input
/// files.
FileID getAdjustedFileID(FileID FID) const;
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
index 0408eeb6a95b00..593f11512a097e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
@@ -173,54 +173,50 @@ GetAffectingModuleMaps(const Preprocessor &PP, Module *RootModule) {
const HeaderSearch &HS = PP.getHeaderSearchInfo();
const ModuleMap &MM = HS.getModuleMap();
- const SourceManager &SourceMgr = PP.getSourceManager();
std::set<const FileEntry *> ModuleMaps;
- auto CollectIncludingModuleMaps = [&](FileID FID, FileEntryRef F) {
- if (!ModuleMaps.insert(F).second)
+ std::set<const Module *> ProcessedModules;
+ auto CollectModuleMapsForHierarchy = [&](const Module *M) {
+ M = M->getTopLevelModule();
+
+ if (!ProcessedModules.insert(M).second)
return;
- SourceLocation Loc = SourceMgr.getIncludeLoc(FID);
- // The include location of inferred module maps can point into the header
- // file that triggered the inferring. Cut off the walk if that's the case.
- while (Loc.isValid() && isModuleMap(SourceMgr.getFileCharacteristic(Loc))) {
- FID = SourceMgr.getFileID(Loc);
- F = *SourceMgr.getFileEntryRefForID(FID);
- if (!ModuleMaps.insert(F).second)
- break;
- Loc = SourceMgr.getIncludeLoc(FID);
- }
- };
- std::set<const Module *> ProcessedModules;
- auto CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors = [&](const Module *M) {
- for (const Module *Mod = M; Mod; Mod = Mod->Parent) {
- if (!ProcessedModules.insert(Mod).second)
- break;
+ std::queue<const Module *> Q;
+ Q.push(M);
+ while (!Q.empty()) {
+ const Module *Mod = Q.front();
+ Q.pop();
+
// The containing module map is affecting, because it's being pointed
// into by Module::DefinitionLoc.
- if (FileID FID = MM.getContainingModuleMapFileID(Mod); FID.isValid())
- CollectIncludingModuleMaps(FID, *SourceMgr.getFileEntryRefForID(FID));
- // For inferred modules, the module map that allowed inferring is not in
- // the include chain of the virtual containing module map file. It did
- // affect the compilation, though.
- if (FileID FID = MM.getModuleMapFileIDForUniquing(Mod); FID.isValid())
- CollectIncludingModuleMaps(FID, *SourceMgr.getFileEntryRefForID(FID));
+ if (auto FE = MM.getContainingModuleMapFile(Mod))
+ ModuleMaps.insert(*FE);
+ // For inferred modules, the module map that allowed inferring is not
+ // related to the virtual containing module map file. It did affect the
+ // compilation, though.
+ if (auto FE = MM.getModuleMapFileForUniquing(Mod))
+ ModuleMaps.insert(*FE);
+
+ for (auto *SubM : Mod->submodules())
+ Q.push(SubM);
}
};
// Handle all the affecting modules referenced from the root module.
+ CollectModuleMapsForHierarchy(RootModule);
+
std::queue<const Module *> Q;
Q.push(RootModule);
while (!Q.empty()) {
const Module *CurrentModule = Q.front();
Q.pop();
- CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors(CurrentModule);
for (const Module *ImportedModule : CurrentModule->Imports)
- CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors(ImportedModule);
+ CollectModuleMapsForHierarchy(ImportedModule);
for (const Module *UndeclaredModule : CurrentModule->UndeclaredUses)
- CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors(UndeclaredModule);
+ CollectModuleMapsForHierarchy(UndeclaredModule);
for (auto *M : CurrentModule->submodules())
Q.push(M);
@@ -249,9 +245,27 @@ GetAffectingModuleMaps(const Preprocessor &PP, Module *RootModule) {
for (const auto &KH : HS.findResolvedModulesForHeader(*File))
if (const Module *M = KH.getModule())
- CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors(M);
+ CollectModuleMapsForHierarchy(M);
}
+ // FIXME: This algorithm is not correct for module map hierarchies where
+ // module map file defining a (sub)module of a top-level module X includes
+ // a module map file that defines a (sub)module of another top-level module Y.
+ // Whenever X is affecting and Y is not, "replaying" this PCM file will fail
+ // when parsing module map files for X due to not knowing about the `extern`
+ // module map for Y.
+ //
+ // We don't have a good way to fix it here. We could mark all children of
+ // affecting module map files as being affecting as well, but that's
+ // expensive. SourceManager does not model the edge from parent to child
+ // SLocEntries, so instead, we would need to iterate over leaf module map
+ // files, walk up their include hierarchy and check whether we arrive at an
+ // affecting module map.
+ //
+ // Instead of complicating and slowing down this function, we should probably
+ // just ban module map hierarchies where module map defining a (sub)module X
+ // includes a module map defining a module that's not a submodule of X.
+
return ModuleMaps;
}
@@ -1639,6 +1653,18 @@ struct InputFileEntry {
} // namespace
+SourceLocation ASTWriter::getAffectingIncludeLoc(const SourceManager &SourceMgr,
+ const SrcMgr::FileInfo &File) {
+ SourceLocation IncludeLoc = File.getIncludeLoc();
+ if (IncludeLoc.isValid()) {
+ FileID IncludeFID = SourceMgr.getFileID(IncludeLoc);
+ assert(IncludeFID.isValid() && "IncludeLoc in invalid file");
+ if (!IsSLocAffecting[IncludeFID.ID])
+ IncludeLoc = SourceLocation();
+ }
+ return IncludeLoc;
+}
+
void ASTWriter::WriteInputFiles(SourceManager &SourceMgr,
HeaderSearchOptions &HSOpts) {
using namespace llvm;
@@ -1692,7 +1718,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteInputFiles(SourceManager &SourceMgr,
Entry.IsSystemFile = isSystem(File.getFileCharacteristic());
Entry.IsTransient = Cache->IsTransient;
Entry.BufferOverridden = Cache->BufferOverridden;
- Entry.IsTopLevel = File.getIncludeLoc().isInvalid();
+ Entry.IsTopLevel = getAffectingIncludeLoc(SourceMgr, File).isInvalid();
Entry.IsModuleMap = isModuleMap(File.getFileCharacteristic());
auto ContentHash = hash_code(-1);
@@ -2219,7 +2245,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteSourceManagerBlock(SourceManager &SourceMgr,
SLocEntryOffsets.push_back(Offset);
// Starting offset of this entry within this module, so skip the dummy.
Record.push_back(getAdjustedOffset(SLoc->getOffset()) - 2);
- AddSourceLocation(File.getIncludeLoc(), Record);
+ AddSourceLocation(getAffectingIncludeLoc(SourceMgr, File), Record);
Record.push_back(File.getFileCharacteristic()); // FIXME: stable encoding
Record.push_back(File.hasLineDirectives());
diff --git a/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/modules-extern-unrelated.m b/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/modules-extern-unrelated.m
index 76611c596d3eff..957132fd5b1854 100644
--- a/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/modules-extern-unrelated.m
+++ b/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/modules-extern-unrelated.m
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+// This test checks that only module map files defining affecting modules are
+// affecting.
+
// RUN: rm -rf %t
// RUN: split-file %s %t
@@ -22,15 +25,8 @@
//--- second/second.h
#include "first_other.h"
-//--- cdb.json.template
-[{
- "directory": "DIR",
- "file": "DIR/tu.m",
- "command": "clang -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=DIR/cache -I DIR/zeroth -I DIR/first -I DIR/second -c DIR/tu.m -o DIR/tu.o"
-}]
-
-// RUN: sed -e "s|DIR|%/t|g" -e "s|INPUTS|%/S/Inputs|g" %t/cdb.json.template > %t/cdb.json
-// RUN: clang-scan-deps -compilation-database %t/cdb.json -format experimental-full > %t/result.json
+// RUN: clang-scan-deps -format experimental-full -o %t/result.json \
+// RUN: -- %clang -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t/cache -I %t/zeroth -I %t/first -I %t/second -c %t/tu.m -o %t/tu.o
// RUN: cat %t/result.json | sed 's:\\\\\?:/:g' | FileCheck %s -DPREFIX=%/t
// CHECK: {
@@ -67,11 +63,11 @@
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
// CHECK-NEXT: "clang-modulemap-file": "[[PREFIX]]/second/second.modulemap",
// CHECK-NEXT: "command-line": [
+// CHECK-NOT: "-fmodule-map-file=[[PREFIX]]/second/module.modulemap"
// CHECK: ],
// CHECK-NEXT: "context-hash": "{{.*}}",
// CHECK-NEXT: "file-deps": [
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/first/module.modulemap",
-// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/second/module.modulemap",
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/second/second.h",
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/second/second.modulemap"
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
@@ -90,11 +86,11 @@
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
// CHECK-NEXT: "clang-modulemap-file": "[[PREFIX]]/zeroth/module.modulemap",
// CHECK-NEXT: "command-line": [
+// CHECK-NOT: "-fmodule-map-file=[[PREFIX]]/second/module.modulemap"
// CHECK: ],
// CHECK-NEXT: "context-hash": "{{.*}}",
// CHECK-NEXT: "file-deps": [
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/first/module.modulemap",
-// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/second/module.modulemap",
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/second/second.modulemap",
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/zeroth/module.modulemap",
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/zeroth/zeroth.h"
@@ -115,7 +111,7 @@
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
// CHECK-NEXT: "command-line": [
// CHECK: ],
-// CHECK-NEXT: "executable": "clang",
+// CHECK-NEXT: "executable": "{{.*}}",
// CHECK-NEXT: "file-deps": [
// CHECK-NEXT: "[[PREFIX]]/tu.m"
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
|
} | ||
|
||
// FIXME: This algorithm is not correct for module map hierarchies where |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this working before, or always broken?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The whole concept of mapping modules to module map files is broken. However, we would previously correctly mark MSub1.modulemap
as affecting and we won't with this patch:
//--- M.modulemap
module M {}
extern module M.Sub "MSub1.modulemap"
//--- MSub1.modulemap
extern module M.Sub "MSub2.modulemap"
//--- MSub2.modulemap
module M.Sub {}
Previously we would walk up the module map file include hierarchy from MSub2.modulemap
to MSub1.modulemap
to M.modulemap
.
Now, we will only walk the module hierarchy and only mark the defining MSub2.modulemap
and M.modulemap
as affecting, effectively creating a "hole" in the tree of module map file includes by omitting MSub1.modulemap
.
Similar thing happens in this case (assuming M
is affecting and N
is not):
//--- N.modulemap
module N {}
extern module N.Sub "NSub.modulemap"
//--- NSub.modulemap
module N.Sub {}
module M {}
However, cases like the following were broken before and will remain broken with this patch:
//--- M.modulemap
module M {}
extern module M.Sub "MSub.modulemap"
//--- MSub.modulemap
module M.Sub {}
extern module N "N.modulemap"
//--- N.modulemap
module N {}
//--- M.modulemap
module M {}
module N {}
extern module M.Sub "MSub.modulemap"
extern module N.Sub "NSub.modulemap"
//--- MSub.modulemap
module M.Sub {}
//--- NSub.modulemap
module N.Sub {}
etc...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now, we will only walk the module hierarchy and only mark the defining MSub2.modulemap and M.modulemap as affecting, effectively creating a "hole" in the tree of module map file includes by omitting MSub1.modulemap.
Does this cause a failure when it tries to include MSub1.modulemap? In some sense this scenario could be "fine" since you have all the modulemaps that contributed to the module definition.
However, cases like the following were broken before and will remain broken with this patch:
Would being lazier about the module definitions solve this?
I'm not clear what the path to actually fixing these looks like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this cause a failure when it tries to include MSub1.modulemap? In some sense this scenario could be "fine" since you have all the modulemaps that contributed to the module definition.
Yes, exactly.
I thought this will break the AST file replay mode, but that doesn't actually reparse the module map file:
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fmodules-embed-all-files -emit-module -fmodule-name=M %t/M.modulemap -o %t/M.pcm
// RUN: rm %t/*.modulemap
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -E %t/M.pcm
One way of actually hitting this issue is compiling the module with a pruned file system that only contains files reported by the scanner. There are lots of different ways people compile modules, so maybe that is relevant.
However, cases like the following were broken before and will remain broken with this patch:
Would being lazier about the module definitions solve this?
What do you mean by this? Ignoring missing files in extern module X "<file>"
until we actually need X
?
I'm not clear what the path to actually fixing these looks like
I'm a fan of defining this away by posing restrictions on the shape of the module map file hierarchies (so that they more or less correspond to the module graph they describe).
…m#89992) The dependency scanner only puts top-level affecting module map files on the command line for explicitly building a module. This is done because any affecting child module map files should be referenced by the top-level one, meaning listing them explicitly does not have any meaning and only makes the command lines longer. However, a problem arises whenever the definition of an affecting module lives in a module map that is not top-level. Considering the rules explained above, such module map file would not make it to the command line. That's why 83973cf started marking the parents of an affecting module map file as affecting too. This way, the top-level file does make it into the command line. This can be problematic, though. On macOS, for example, the Darwin module lives in "/usr/include/Darwin.modulemap" one of many module map files included by "/usr/include/module.modulemap". Reporting the parent on the command line forces explicit builds to parse all the other module map files included by it, which is not necessary and can get expensive in terms of file system traffic. This patch solves that performance issue by stopping marking parent module map files as affecting, and marking module map files as top-level whenever they are top-level among the set of affecting files, not among the set of all known files. This means that the top-level "/usr/include/module.modulemap" is now not marked as affecting and "/usr/include/Darwin.modulemap" is. (cherry picked from commit 477c705)
The dependency scanner only puts top-level affecting module map files on the command line for explicitly building a module. This is done because any affecting child module map files should be referenced by the top-level one, meaning listing them explicitly does not have any meaning and only makes the command lines longer.
However, a problem arises whenever the definition of an affecting module lives in a module map that is not top-level. Considering the rules explained above, such module map file would not make it to the command line. That's why 83973cf started marking the parents of an affecting module map file as affecting too. This way, the top-level file does make it into the command line.
This can be problematic, though. On macOS, for example, the Darwin module lives in "/usr/include/Darwin.modulemap" one of many module map files included by "/usr/include/module.modulemap". Reporting the parent on the command line forces explicit builds to parse all the other module map files included by it, which is not necessary and can get expensive in terms of file system traffic.
This patch solves that performance issue by stopping marking parent module map files as affecting, and marking module map files as top-level whenever they are top-level among the set of affecting files, not among the set of all known files. This means that the top-level "/usr/include/module.modulemap" is now not marked as affecting and "/usr/include/Darwin.modulemap" is.