Skip to content

[Sema] Fix handling of fields with initializers in nested anonymous unions. #91692

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 10 additions & 13 deletions clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -814,19 +814,13 @@ InitListChecker::FillInEmptyInitializations(const InitializedEntity &Entity,

if (const RecordType *RType = ILE->getType()->getAs<RecordType>()) {
const RecordDecl *RDecl = RType->getDecl();
if (RDecl->isUnion() && ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion())
FillInEmptyInitForField(0, ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion(),
Entity, ILE, RequiresSecondPass, FillWithNoInit);
else if (RDecl->isUnion() && isa<CXXRecordDecl>(RDecl) &&
cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RDecl)->hasInClassInitializer()) {
for (auto *Field : RDecl->fields()) {
if (Field->hasInClassInitializer()) {
FillInEmptyInitForField(0, Field, Entity, ILE, RequiresSecondPass,
FillWithNoInit);
break;
}
}
if (RDecl->isUnion() && ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion()) {
FillInEmptyInitForField(0, ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion(), Entity, ILE,
RequiresSecondPass, FillWithNoInit);
} else {
assert((!RDecl->isUnion() || !isa<CXXRecordDecl>(RDecl) ||
!cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RDecl)->hasInClassInitializer()) &&
"We should have computed initialized fields already");
// The fields beyond ILE->getNumInits() are default initialized, so in
// order to leave them uninitialized, the ILE is expanded and the extra
// fields are then filled with NoInitExpr.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2164,12 +2158,15 @@ void InitListChecker::CheckStructUnionTypes(
return;
for (RecordDecl::field_iterator FieldEnd = RD->field_end();
Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
if (Field->hasInClassInitializer()) {
if (Field->hasInClassInitializer() ||
(Field->isAnonymousStructOrUnion() &&
Field->getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl()->hasInClassInitializer())) {
StructuredList->setInitializedFieldInUnion(*Field);
// FIXME: Actually build a CXXDefaultInitExpr?
return;
}
}
llvm_unreachable("Couldn't find in-class initializer");
}

// Value-initialize the first member of the union that isn't an unnamed
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion clang/test/AST/ast-dump-APValue-anon-union.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void Test() {

constexpr U0 u0a{};
// CHECK: | `-VarDecl {{.*}} <col:{{.*}}, col:{{.*}}> col:{{.*}} u0a 'const U0' constexpr listinit
// CHECK-NEXT: | |-value: Union None
// CHECK-NEXT: | |-value: Union .U0::(anonymous union at {{.*}}) Union .f Float 3.141500e+00

constexpr U0 u0b{3.1415f};
// CHECK: | `-VarDecl {{.*}} <col:{{.*}}, col:{{.*}}> col:{{.*}} u0b 'const U0' constexpr listinit
Expand Down
38 changes: 38 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-initializer-aggregates.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77,3 +77,41 @@ namespace use_self {

int fib(int n) { return FibTree{n}.v; }
}

namespace nested_union {
union Test1 {
union {
int inner { 42 };
};
int outer;
};
static_assert(Test1{}.inner == 42, "");
struct Test2 {
union {
struct {
int inner : 32 { 42 }; // expected-warning {{C++20 extension}}
int inner_no_init;
};
int outer;
};
};
static_assert(Test2{}.inner == 42, "");
static_assert(Test2{}.inner_no_init == 0, "");
struct Int { int x; };
struct Test3 {
int x;
union {
struct { // expected-note {{in implicit initialization}}
const int& y; // expected-note {{uninitialized reference member is here}}
int inner : 32 { 42 }; // expected-warning {{C++20 extension}}
};
int outer;
};
};
Test3 test3 = {1}; // expected-error {{reference member of type 'const int &' uninitialized}}
constexpr char f(Test3) { return 1; } // expected-note {{candidate function}}
constexpr char f(Int) { return 2; } // expected-note {{candidate function}}
// FIXME: This shouldn't be ambiguous; either we should reject the declaration
// of Test3, or we should exclude f(Test3) as a candidate.
static_assert(f({1}) == 2, ""); // expected-error {{call to 'f' is ambiguous}}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe an expected-error for Test3 test3 = {1}; would be nice here too. I think that part at least should work -- if I'm understanding correctly, we're only missing the check for the uninitialized reference member during overload resolution / in VerifyOnly mode?

}
Loading