Skip to content

[InstCombine] Try the flipped strictness of predicate in foldICmpShlConstant #92773

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
36 changes: 28 additions & 8 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2414,14 +2414,34 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldICmpShlConstant(ICmpInst &Cmp,
// free on the target. It has the additional benefit of comparing to a
// smaller constant that may be more target-friendly.
unsigned Amt = ShiftAmt->getLimitedValue(TypeBits - 1);
if (Shl->hasOneUse() && Amt != 0 && C.countr_zero() >= Amt &&
DL.isLegalInteger(TypeBits - Amt)) {
Type *TruncTy = IntegerType::get(Cmp.getContext(), TypeBits - Amt);
if (auto *ShVTy = dyn_cast<VectorType>(ShType))
TruncTy = VectorType::get(TruncTy, ShVTy->getElementCount());
Constant *NewC =
ConstantInt::get(TruncTy, C.ashr(*ShiftAmt).trunc(TypeBits - Amt));
return new ICmpInst(Pred, Builder.CreateTrunc(X, TruncTy), NewC);
if (Shl->hasOneUse() && Amt != 0 &&
shouldChangeType(ShType->getScalarSizeInBits(), TypeBits - Amt)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To account for Vec types should construct ShType->getWithNewBitWidth(TypeBits - Amt) and use that + ShType for this check.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#92773 (comment)

It breaks some vec tests.

ICmpInst::Predicate CmpPred = Pred;
APInt RHSC = C;

if (RHSC.countr_zero() < Amt && ICmpInst::isStrictPredicate(CmpPred)) {
// Try the flipped strictness predicate.
// e.g.:
// icmp ult i64 (shl X, 32), 8589934593 ->
// icmp ule i64 (shl X, 32), 8589934592 ->
// icmp ule i32 (trunc X, i32), 2 ->
// icmp ult i32 (trunc X, i32), 3
if (auto FlippedStrictness =
InstCombiner::getFlippedStrictnessPredicateAndConstant(
Pred, ConstantInt::get(ShType->getContext(), C))) {
CmpPred = FlippedStrictness->first;
RHSC = cast<ConstantInt>(FlippedStrictness->second)->getValue();
}
}

if (RHSC.countr_zero() >= Amt) {
Type *TruncTy = ShType->getWithNewBitWidth(TypeBits - Amt);
Constant *NewC =
ConstantInt::get(TruncTy, RHSC.ashr(*ShiftAmt).trunc(TypeBits - Amt));
return new ICmpInst(
CmpPred, Builder.CreateTrunc(X, TruncTy, "", Shl->hasNoSignedWrap()),
NewC);
}
}

return nullptr;
Expand Down
97 changes: 97 additions & 0 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5198,3 +5198,100 @@ define i1 @icmp_freeze_sext(i16 %x, i16 %y) {
%cmp2 = icmp uge i16 %ext.fr, %y
ret i1 %cmp2
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = trunc i64 [[X:%.*]] to i32
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[TMP1]], 3
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl i64 %x, 32
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %shl, 8589934593
ret i1 %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_multiuse(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_multiuse(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i64 [[X:%.*]], 32
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @use_i64(i64 [[SHL]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[SHL]], 8589934593
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl i64 %x, 32
call void @use_i64(i64 %shl)
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %shl, 8589934593
ret i1 %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_illegal_length(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_illegal_length(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i64 [[X:%.*]], 31
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[SHL]], 8589934593
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl i64 %x, 31
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %shl, 8589934593
ret i1 %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_invalid_rhsc(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_invalid_rhsc(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i64 [[X:%.*]], 32
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[SHL]], 8589934595
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl i64 %x, 32
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %shl, 8589934595
ret i1 %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_nuw(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_nuw(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[X:%.*]], 3
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl nuw i64 %x, 32
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %shl, 8589934593
ret i1 %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_nsw(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_nsw(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[X:%.*]], 3
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl nsw i64 %x, 32
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %shl, 8589934593
ret i1 %cmp
}

define <2 x i1> @test_icmp_shl_vec(<2 x i64> %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_vec(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = trunc <2 x i64> [[X:%.*]] to <2 x i32>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult <2 x i32> [[TMP1]], <i32 3, i32 3>
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i1> [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl <2 x i64> %x, splat(i64 32)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didn't know about the splat syntax, thats nice :)

%cmp = icmp ult <2 x i64> %shl, splat(i64 8589934593)
ret <2 x i1> %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_eq(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_eq(
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
;
%shl = shl i64 %x, 32
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %shl, 8589934593
ret i1 %cmp
}

define i1 @test_icmp_shl_sgt(i64 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_icmp_shl_sgt(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = trunc i64 [[X:%.*]] to i32
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[TMP1]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]]
;
%shl = shl i64 %x, 32
%cmp = icmp sgt i64 %shl, 8589934591
ret i1 %cmp
}
Loading