-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[C++20] [Modules] Don't generate the defintition for non-const available external variables #93530
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ | ||
// RUN: rm -rf %t | ||
// RUN: mkdir -p %t | ||
// RUN: split-file %s %t | ||
|
||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -std=c++20 %t/mod.cppm \ | ||
// RUN: -emit-module-interface -o %t/mod.pcm | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -std=c++20 %t/use.cpp \ | ||
// RUN: -fmodule-file=mod=%t/mod.pcm -emit-llvm \ | ||
// RUN: -o - | opt -S --passes=simplifycfg | FileCheck %t/use.cpp | ||
|
||
//--- mod.cppm | ||
export module mod; | ||
|
||
export struct Thing { | ||
static const Thing One; | ||
explicit Thing(int raw) :raw(raw) { } | ||
int raw; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
const Thing Thing::One = Thing(1); | ||
|
||
export struct C { | ||
int value; | ||
}; | ||
export const C ConstantValue = {1}; | ||
|
||
export const C *ConstantPtr = &ConstantValue; | ||
|
||
C NonConstantValue = {1}; | ||
export const C &ConstantRef = NonConstantValue; | ||
|
||
export struct NonConstexprDtor { | ||
constexpr NonConstexprDtor(int raw) : raw(raw) {} | ||
~NonConstexprDtor(); | ||
|
||
int raw; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export const NonConstexprDtor NonConstexprDtorValue = {1}; | ||
|
||
//--- use.cpp | ||
import mod; | ||
|
||
int consume(int); | ||
int consumeC(C); | ||
|
||
extern "C" __attribute__((noinline)) inline int unneeded() { | ||
return consume(43); | ||
} | ||
|
||
extern "C" __attribute__((noinline)) inline int needed() { | ||
return consume(43); | ||
} | ||
|
||
int use() { | ||
Thing t1 = Thing::One; | ||
return consume(t1.raw); | ||
} | ||
|
||
int use2() { | ||
if (ConstantValue.value) | ||
return consumeC(ConstantValue); | ||
return unneeded(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
int use3() { | ||
auto Ptr = ConstantPtr; | ||
if (Ptr->value) | ||
return consumeC(*Ptr); | ||
return needed(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
int use4() { | ||
auto Ref = ConstantRef; | ||
if (Ref.value) | ||
return consumeC(Ref); | ||
return needed(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
int use5() { | ||
NonConstexprDtor V = NonConstexprDtorValue; | ||
if (V.raw) | ||
return consume(V.raw); | ||
return needed(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// CHECK: @_ZNW3mod5Thing3OneE = external | ||
// CHECK: @_ZW3mod13ConstantValue ={{.*}}available_externally{{.*}} constant | ||
// CHECK: @_ZW3mod11ConstantPtr = external | ||
// CHECK: @_ZW3mod16NonConstantValue = external | ||
// CHECK: @_ZW3mod21NonConstexprDtorValue = external | ||
|
||
// Check that the middle end can optimize the program by the constant information. | ||
// CHECK-NOT: @unneeded( | ||
|
||
// Check that the use of ConstantPtr won't get optimized incorrectly. | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @_Z4use3v( | ||
// CHECK: @needed( | ||
|
||
// Check that the use of ConstantRef won't get optimized incorrectly. | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @_Z4use4v( | ||
// CHECK: @needed( | ||
|
||
// Check that the use of NonConstexprDtorValue won't get optimized incorrectly. | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @_Z4use5v( | ||
// CHECK: @needed( |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we check for needsDestruction()? (For example, consider a struct with a constexpr constructor, but a non-trivial destructor.)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(we think) the available externally variables don't need ctor or dtor in the current TU. I mentioned this in the comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I mean, please make sure we don't emit an available_externally definition in that case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. Makes sense. Done.