Skip to content

[TEST][Darwin] Change x86_64h UNSUPPORTED lit feature used in san cov test #93706

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

thetruestblue
Copy link
Contributor

Fix x86_64 lit feature. x86-target-arch not set for x86_64h

x86-target-arch not set for x86_64.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 29, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer

Author: None (thetruestblue)

Changes

Fix x86_64 lit feature. x86-target-arch not set for x86_64h

x86-target-arch not set for x86_64.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93706.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cpp (+1-1)
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cpp b/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cpp
index ee47a1228fcc5..eea92d0ba9e83 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cpp
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 // REQUIRES: has_sancovcc
 // UNSUPPORTED: ubsan,i386-darwin,target={{(powerpc64|s390x|thumb).*}}
 // This test is failing for lsan on darwin on x86_64h.
-// UNSUPPORTED: darwin && x86-target-arch && lsan
+// UNSUPPORTED: x86_64h-darwin && lsan
 // XFAIL: tsan
 // XFAIL: android && asan
 

@wrotki
Copy link
Contributor

wrotki commented May 29, 2024

LGTM. Verified the fix on my x86 Mac, it shows UNSUPPORTED for SanitizerCommon-lsan-x86_64h-Darwin as intended

@thetruestblue thetruestblue merged commit dcbd1fb into llvm:main May 29, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants