Skip to content

[InstCombine] Fold (add X, (sext/zext (icmp eq X, C))) #93840

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1694,6 +1694,24 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitAdd(BinaryOperator &I) {
return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(LHS, Zext);
}

{
Value *Cond, *Ext;
Constant *C;
// (add X, (sext/zext (icmp eq X, C)))
// -> (select (icmp eq X, C), (add C, (sext/zext 1)), X)
auto CondMatcher = m_CombineAnd(
m_Value(Cond), m_ICmp(Pred, m_Deferred(A), m_ImmConstant(C)));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might be a bit more elegant if you match m_Value(Cond) first and then do a second match call on Cond. Especially with this in a separate variable (so that m_Deferred occurs before the corresponding m_Value) I found this confusing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That will be flakey if X itself is a sext/zext of another value though no?


if (match(&I,
m_c_Add(m_Value(A),
m_CombineAnd(m_Value(Ext), m_ZExtOrSExt(CondMatcher)))) &&
Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && Ext->hasOneUse()) {
Value *Add = isa<ZExtInst>(Ext) ? InstCombiner::AddOne(C)
: InstCombiner::SubOne(C);
return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateSelect(Cond, Add, A));
}
}

if (Instruction *Ashr = foldAddToAshr(I))
return Ashr;

Expand Down
17 changes: 5 additions & 12 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/apint-shift.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ define i23 @test11(i23 %x) {

define i47 @test12(i47 %X) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test12(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SH2:%.*]] = and i47 [[X:%.*]], -256
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i47 [[SH2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SH1:%.*]] = and i47 [[X:%.*]], -256
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i47 [[SH1]]
;
%sh1 = ashr i47 %X, 8
%sh2 = shl i47 %sh1, 8
Expand All @@ -250,8 +250,8 @@ define i47 @test12(i47 %X) {

define <2 x i47> @test12_splat_vec(<2 x i47> %X) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test12_splat_vec(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SH2:%.*]] = and <2 x i47> [[X:%.*]], <i47 -256, i47 -256>
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i47> [[SH2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SH1:%.*]] = and <2 x i47> [[X:%.*]], <i47 -256, i47 -256>
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i47> [[SH1]]
;
%sh1 = ashr <2 x i47> %X, <i47 8, i47 8>
%sh2 = shl <2 x i47> %sh1, <i47 8, i47 8>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -564,14 +564,7 @@ define i40 @test26(i40 %A) {
; https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=9880
define i177 @ossfuzz_9880(i177 %X) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @ossfuzz_9880(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = alloca i177, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT: [[L1:%.*]] = load i177, ptr [[A]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp eq i177 [[L1]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B5_NEG:%.*]] = sext i1 [[TMP1]] to i177
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B14:%.*]] = add i177 [[L1]], [[B5_NEG]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = icmp eq i177 [[B14]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B1:%.*]] = zext i1 [[TMP2]] to i177
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i177 [[B1]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i177 0
;
%A = alloca i177
%L1 = load i177, ptr %A
Expand Down
58 changes: 58 additions & 0 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/fold-ext-eq-c-with-op.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
; RUN: opt < %s -passes=instcombine -S | FileCheck %s

declare void @use.i8(i8)
define i8 @fold_add_zext_eq_0(i8 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_add_zext_eq_0(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = call i8 @llvm.umax.i8(i8 [[X:%.*]], i8 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[R]]
;
%x_eq = icmp eq i8 %x, 0
%x_eq_ext = zext i1 %x_eq to i8
%r = add i8 %x, %x_eq_ext
ret i8 %r
}

define <2 x i8> @fold_add_sext_eq_4_6(<2 x i6> %xx) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_add_sext_eq_4_6(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X:%.*]] = zext <2 x i6> [[XX:%.*]] to <2 x i8>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X_EQ:%.*]] = icmp eq <2 x i8> [[X]], <i8 4, i8 -127>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = select <2 x i1> [[X_EQ]], <2 x i8> <i8 3, i8 -128>, <2 x i8> [[X]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i8> [[R]]
;
%x = zext <2 x i6> %xx to <2 x i8>
%x_eq = icmp eq <2 x i8> %x, <i8 4, i8 129>
%x_eq_ext = sext <2 x i1> %x_eq to <2 x i8>
%r = add <2 x i8> %x_eq_ext, %x
ret <2 x i8> %r
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commuted tests?


define i8 @fold_add_zext_eq_0_fail_multiuse_exp(i8 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_add_zext_eq_0_fail_multiuse_exp(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X_EQ:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[X:%.*]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X_EQ_EXT:%.*]] = zext i1 [[X_EQ]] to i8
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = add i8 [[X_EQ_EXT]], [[X]]
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @use.i8(i8 [[X_EQ_EXT]])
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[R]]
;
%x_eq = icmp eq i8 %x, 0
%x_eq_ext = zext i1 %x_eq to i8
%r = add i8 %x, %x_eq_ext
call void @use.i8(i8 %x_eq_ext)
ret i8 %r
}

define i8 @fold_add_sext_eq_4_fail_wrong_cond(i8 %x, i8 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_add_sext_eq_4_fail_wrong_cond(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X_EQ:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[Y:%.*]], 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[X_EQ_EXT:%.*]] = sext i1 [[X_EQ]] to i8
; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = add i8 [[X_EQ_EXT]], [[X:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @use.i8(i8 [[X_EQ_EXT]])
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[R]]
;
%x_eq = icmp eq i8 %y, 4
%x_eq_ext = sext i1 %x_eq to i8
%r = add i8 %x, %x_eq_ext
call void @use.i8(i8 %x_eq_ext)
ret i8 %r
}
Loading