Skip to content

[MLIR][LLVM] Add inlining support for loop annotations #94447

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

Dinistro
Copy link
Contributor

@Dinistro Dinistro commented Jun 5, 2024

This commit extends the LLVM dialect's inliner interface support updating loop annotation attributes. This is necessary because the loop annotations can contain debug locations, which are verified by LLVM's verifier. LLVM requires these locations to have the same scope as the function this attribute is contained in.

This commit extends the LLVM dialect's inliner interface support
updating loop annotation attributes. This is necessary because the loop
annotations can contain debug locations, which are verified by LLVM's
verifier. LLVM requires these locations to have the same scope as the
function this attribute is contained in.
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 5, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-llvm

Author: Christian Ulmann (Dinistro)

Changes

This commit extends the LLVM dialect's inliner interface support updating loop annotation attributes. This is necessary because the loop annotations can contain debug locations, which are verified by LLVM's verifier. LLVM requires these locations to have the same scope as the function this attribute is contained in.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94447.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMInlining.cpp (+52)
  • (added) mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/inlining-loop-annotation.mlir (+56)
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMInlining.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMInlining.cpp
index 4a6154ea6d300..010fde94dced6 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMInlining.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/LLVMIR/IR/LLVMInlining.cpp
@@ -513,6 +513,57 @@ static void handleAccessGroups(Operation *call,
           accessGroupOpInterface.getAccessGroupsOrNull(), accessGroups));
 }
 
+/// Updates locations inside loop annotations to reflect that they were inlined.
+static void
+handleLoopAnnotations(Operation *call,
+                      iterator_range<Region::iterator> inlinedBlocks) {
+  // Attempt to extract a DISubprogram from the callee.
+  auto func = call->getParentOfType<FunctionOpInterface>();
+  if (!func)
+    return;
+  LocationAttr funcLoc = func->getLoc();
+  auto fusedLoc = dyn_cast_if_present<FusedLoc>(funcLoc);
+  if (!fusedLoc)
+    return;
+  auto scope =
+      dyn_cast_if_present<LLVM::DISubprogramAttr>(fusedLoc.getMetadata());
+  if (!scope)
+    return;
+
+  // Helper to build a new fused location that reflects the inlining of the loop
+  // annotation.
+  auto updateLoc = [&](FusedLoc loc) -> FusedLoc {
+    if (!loc)
+      return {};
+    Location callSiteLoc = CallSiteLoc::get(loc, call->getLoc());
+    return FusedLoc::get(loc.getContext(), callSiteLoc, scope);
+  };
+
+  AttrTypeReplacer replacer;
+  replacer.addReplacement([&](LLVM::LoopAnnotationAttr loopAnnotation)
+                              -> std::pair<Attribute, WalkResult> {
+    FusedLoc newStartLoc = updateLoc(loopAnnotation.getStartLoc());
+    FusedLoc newEndLoc = updateLoc(loopAnnotation.getEndLoc());
+    if (!newStartLoc && !newEndLoc)
+      return {loopAnnotation, WalkResult::advance()};
+    auto newLoopAnnotation = LLVM::LoopAnnotationAttr::get(
+        loopAnnotation.getContext(), loopAnnotation.getDisableNonforced(),
+        loopAnnotation.getVectorize(), loopAnnotation.getInterleave(),
+        loopAnnotation.getUnroll(), loopAnnotation.getUnrollAndJam(),
+        loopAnnotation.getLicm(), loopAnnotation.getDistribute(),
+        loopAnnotation.getPipeline(), loopAnnotation.getPeeled(),
+        loopAnnotation.getUnswitch(), loopAnnotation.getMustProgress(),
+        loopAnnotation.getIsVectorized(), newStartLoc, newEndLoc,
+        loopAnnotation.getParallelAccesses());
+    // Needs to advance, as loop annotations can be nested.
+    return {newLoopAnnotation, WalkResult::advance()};
+  });
+
+  for (Block &block : inlinedBlocks)
+    for (Operation &op : block)
+      replacer.recursivelyReplaceElementsIn(&op);
+}
+
 /// If `requestedAlignment` is higher than the alignment specified on `alloca`,
 /// realigns `alloca` if this does not exceed the natural stack alignment.
 /// Returns the post-alignment of `alloca`, whether it was realigned or not.
@@ -787,6 +838,7 @@ struct LLVMInlinerInterface : public DialectInlinerInterface {
     handleInlinedAllocas(call, inlinedBlocks);
     handleAliasScopes(call, inlinedBlocks);
     handleAccessGroups(call, inlinedBlocks);
+    handleLoopAnnotations(call, inlinedBlocks);
   }
 
   // Keeping this (immutable) state on the interface allows us to look up
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/inlining-loop-annotation.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/inlining-loop-annotation.mlir
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..e218c151400c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/LLVMIR/inlining-loop-annotation.mlir
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -inline -split-input-file | FileCheck %s
+
+#di_file = #llvm.di_file<"file.mlir" in "/">
+
+// CHECK: #[[START_ORIGINAL:.*]] = loc({{.*}}:42
+#loc1 = loc("test.mlir":42:4)
+// CHECK: #[[END_ORIGINAL:.*]] = loc({{.*}}:52
+#loc2 = loc("test.mlir":52:4)
+#loc3 = loc("test.mlir":62:4)
+// CHECK: #[[CALL_ORIGINAL:.*]] = loc({{.*}}:72
+#loc4 = loc("test.mlir":72:4)
+
+#di_compile_unit = #llvm.di_compile_unit<id = distinct[0]<>, sourceLanguage = DW_LANG_C, file = #di_file, isOptimized = false, emissionKind = None>
+// CHECK: #[[CALLEE_DI:.*]] = #llvm.di_subprogram<{{.*}}, name = "callee"
+#di_subprogram_callee = #llvm.di_subprogram<compileUnit = #di_compile_unit, scope = #di_file, name = "callee", file = #di_file, subprogramFlags = Definition>
+
+// CHECK: #[[CALLER_DI:.*]] = #llvm.di_subprogram<{{.*}}, name = "caller"
+#di_subprogram_caller = #llvm.di_subprogram<compileUnit = #di_compile_unit, scope = #di_file, name = "caller", file = #di_file, subprogramFlags = Definition>
+
+// CHECK: #[[START_FUSED_ORIGINAL:.*]] = loc(fused<#[[CALLEE_DI]]>[#[[START_ORIGINAL]]
+#start_loc_fused = loc(fused<#di_subprogram_callee>[#loc1])
+// CHECK: #[[END_FUSED_ORIGINAL:.*]] = loc(fused<#[[CALLEE_DI]]>[#[[END_ORIGINAL]]
+#end_loc_fused= loc(fused<#di_subprogram_callee>[#loc2])
+#caller_loc= loc(fused<#di_subprogram_caller>[#loc3])
+// CHECK: #[[CALL_FUSED:.*]] = loc(fused<#[[CALLER_DI]]>[#[[CALL_ORIGINAL]]
+#call_loc= loc(fused<#di_subprogram_caller>[#loc4])
+
+#loopMD = #llvm.loop_annotation<
+        startLoc = #start_loc_fused,
+        endLoc = #end_loc_fused>
+
+// CHECK: #[[START_CALLSITE_LOC:.*]] = loc(callsite(#[[START_FUSED_ORIGINAL]] at #[[CALL_FUSED]]
+// CHECK: #[[END_CALLSITE_LOC:.*]] = loc(callsite(#[[END_FUSED_ORIGINAL]] at #[[CALL_FUSED]]
+// CHECK: #[[START_FUSED_LOC:.*]] = loc(fused<#[[CALLER_DI]]>[#[[START_CALLSITE_LOC]]
+// CHECK: #[[END_FUSED_LOC:.*]] = loc(fused<#[[CALLER_DI]]>[
+// CHECK: #[[LOOP_ANNOT:.*]] = #llvm.loop_annotation<
+// CHECK-SAME: startLoc = #[[START_FUSED_LOC]], endLoc = #[[END_FUSED_LOC]]>
+
+llvm.func @cond() -> i1
+
+llvm.func @callee() {
+  llvm.br ^head
+^head:
+  %c = llvm.call @cond() : () -> i1
+  llvm.cond_br %c, ^head, ^exit {loop_annotation = #loopMD}
+^exit:
+  llvm.return
+}
+
+// CHECK: @loop_annotation
+llvm.func @loop_annotation() {
+  // CHECK: llvm.cond_br
+  // CHECK-SAME: {loop_annotation = #[[LOOP_ANNOT]]
+  llvm.call @callee() : () -> () loc(#call_loc)
+  llvm.return
+} loc(#caller_loc)

Copy link
Contributor

@gysit gysit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Dinistro Dinistro merged commit 6168e82 into main Jun 5, 2024
10 checks passed
@Dinistro Dinistro deleted the users/dinistro/handle-loop-annotation-in-inliner branch June 5, 2024 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants