Skip to content

[StructuralEquivalence] improve NTTP and CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr comparison #95190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

jcsxky
Copy link
Contributor

@jcsxky jcsxky commented Jun 12, 2024

improve ASTStructuralEquivalenceTest:

  1. compare the depth and index of NTTP
  2. provide comparison of CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr to StmtCompare.

@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" labels Jun 12, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 12, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Qizhi Hu (jcsxky)

Changes

improve ASTStructuralEquivalenceTest:

  1. compare the depth and index of NTTP
  2. provide comparison of CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr to StmtCompare.

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95190.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp (+13-1)
  • (modified) clang/unittests/AST/StructuralEquivalenceTest.cpp (+50-2)
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
index d56bf21b459e0..37555c324282f 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp
@@ -348,6 +348,15 @@ class StmtComparer {
     return true;
   }
 
+  bool IsStmtEquivalent(const CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr *E1,
+                        const CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr *E2) {
+    if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, E1->getMember(), E2->getMember())) {
+      return false;
+    }
+    return IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, E1->getBaseType(),
+                                    E2->getBaseType());
+  }
+
   bool IsStmtEquivalent(const UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr *E1,
                         const UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr *E2) {
     if (E1->getKind() != E2->getKind())
@@ -1997,7 +2006,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
     }
     return false;
   }
-
+  if (!Context.IgnoreTemplateParmDepth && D1->getDepth() != D2->getDepth())
+    return false;
+  if (D1->getIndex() != D2->getIndex())
+    return false;
   // Check types.
   if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, D1->getType(), D2->getType())) {
     if (Context.Complain) {
diff --git a/clang/unittests/AST/StructuralEquivalenceTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/AST/StructuralEquivalenceTest.cpp
index 91dd717d7b25e..55b2580bfce3b 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/AST/StructuralEquivalenceTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/AST/StructuralEquivalenceTest.cpp
@@ -1877,6 +1877,34 @@ TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceCacheTest, VarDeclWithDifferentStorageClassNoEq) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(Ctx.IsEquivalent(Var.first, Var.second));
 }
 
+TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceCacheTest,
+       NonTypeTemplateParmWithDifferentPositionNoEq) {
+  auto TU = makeTuDecls(
+      R"(
+      template<int T>
+      struct A {
+        template<int U>
+        void foo() {}
+      };
+      )",
+      R"(
+      template<int U>
+      struct A {
+        template<int V, int T>
+        void foo() {}
+      };
+      )",
+      Lang_CXX03);
+
+  StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx(
+      get<0>(TU)->getASTContext(), get<1>(TU)->getASTContext(),
+      NonEquivalentDecls, StructuralEquivalenceKind::Default, false, false);
+
+  auto NTTP = findDeclPair<NonTypeTemplateParmDecl>(
+      TU, nonTypeTemplateParmDecl(hasName("T")));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Ctx.IsEquivalent(NTTP.first, NTTP.second));
+}
+
 TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceCacheTest, VarDeclWithInitNoEq) {
   auto TU = makeTuDecls(
       R"(
@@ -2441,8 +2469,7 @@ TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceStmtTest, NonTypeTemplateParm) {
       void foo(A<T, y>);
       )",
       Lang_CXX11);
-  // FIXME: These should not match,
-  EXPECT_TRUE(testStructuralMatch(t));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(testStructuralMatch(t));
 }
 
 TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceStmtTest, UnresolvedLookupDifferentName) {
@@ -2595,5 +2622,26 @@ TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceStmtTest, DeclRefExpr) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(testStructuralMatch(t));
 }
 
+const internal::VariadicDynCastAllOfMatcher<Stmt, CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr>
+    cxxDependentScopeMemberExpr;
+
+TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceCacheTest, CXXDependentScopeMemberExprNoEq) {
+  auto S = makeStmts(
+      R"(
+      template <class T>
+      void foo() {
+        T().x;
+      }
+      )",
+      R"(
+      template <class T>
+      void foo() {
+        T().y;
+      }
+      )",
+      Lang_CXX11, cxxDependentScopeMemberExpr());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(testStructuralMatch(S));
+}
+
 } // end namespace ast_matchers
 } // end namespace clang

Copy link
Contributor

@mizvekov mizvekov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thanks!

@jcsxky jcsxky force-pushed the structural-eqivalence-improve branch from 644c6e8 to 157f664 Compare June 12, 2024 02:12
@jcsxky jcsxky force-pushed the structural-eqivalence-improve branch from 157f664 to ba081d5 Compare June 12, 2024 02:37
@jcsxky jcsxky merged commit 66a9e26 into llvm:main Jun 12, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants