[compiler-rt][builtins] Add opt-in pthread_mutex_t locks to libatomic #95326
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When an uninstrumented libatomic is used with a TSan instrumented memcpy, TSan may report a data race in circumstances where writes are arguably safe.
This occurs because __atomic_compare_exchange won't be instrumented in an uninstrumented libatomic, so TSan doesn't know that the subsequent memcpy is race-free.
On the other hand, pthread_mutex_(un)lock will be intercepted by TSan, meaning an uninstrumented libatomic will not report this false-positive.
pthread_mutexes also may try a number of different strategies to acquire the lock, which may bound the amount of time a thread has to wait for a lock during contention.
While pthread_mutex_lock has a larger overhead (due to the function call and some dispatching), a dispatch to libatomic already predicates a lack of performance guarantees.