-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[RISCV] Remove IgnoreUnknown from RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString. #97372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This isn't used in tree, and thus I don't know what the expectations for its behavior really are.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Craig Topper (topperc) ChangesThis isn't used in tree, and thus I don't know what the expectations for its behavior really are. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97372.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.h b/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.h
index 5e9cf67eddcfd..ba2965600decd 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.h
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ class RISCVISAInfo {
/// default version will be used (as ignoring the base is not possible).
static llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<RISCVISAInfo>>
parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool EnableExperimentalExtension,
- bool ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck = true,
- bool IgnoreUnknown = false);
+ bool ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck = true);
/// Parse RISC-V ISA info from an arch string that is already in normalized
/// form (as defined in the psABI). Unlike parseArchString, this function
diff --git a/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.cpp
index 869be57928890..b4fd067a1ed7a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfo.cpp
@@ -522,8 +522,7 @@ RISCVISAInfo::parseNormalizedArchString(StringRef Arch) {
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<RISCVISAInfo>>
RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool EnableExperimentalExtension,
- bool ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck,
- bool IgnoreUnknown) {
+ bool ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck) {
// RISC-V ISA strings must be [a-z0-9_]
if (!llvm::all_of(
Arch, [](char C) { return isDigit(C) || isLower(C) || C == '_'; }))
@@ -567,7 +566,7 @@ RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool EnableExperimentalExtension,
NewArch += ArchWithoutProfile.str();
}
return parseArchString(NewArch, EnableExperimentalExtension,
- ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck, IgnoreUnknown);
+ ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck);
}
}
@@ -601,16 +600,8 @@ RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool EnableExperimentalExtension,
// Baseline is `i` or `e`
if (auto E = getExtensionVersion(
StringRef(&Baseline, 1), Exts, Major, Minor, ConsumeLength,
- EnableExperimentalExtension, ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck)) {
- if (!IgnoreUnknown)
- return std::move(E);
- // If IgnoreUnknown, then ignore an unrecognised version of the baseline
- // ISA and just use the default supported version.
- consumeError(std::move(E));
- auto Version = findDefaultVersion(StringRef(&Baseline, 1));
- Major = Version->Major;
- Minor = Version->Minor;
- }
+ EnableExperimentalExtension, ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck))
+ return std::move(E);
// Postpone AddExtension until end of this function
SeenExtMap[StringRef(&Baseline, 1).str()] = {Major, Minor};
@@ -677,11 +668,10 @@ RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool EnableExperimentalExtension,
Ext = StringRef();
assert(!Type.empty() && "Empty type?");
- if (!IgnoreUnknown && Name.size() == Type.size())
+ if (Name.size() == Type.size())
return createStringError(errc::invalid_argument,
Desc + " name missing after '" + Type + "'");
} else {
- // FIXME: Could it be ignored by IgnoreUnknown?
return createStringError(errc::invalid_argument,
"invalid standard user-level extension '" +
Twine(Ext.front()) + "'");
@@ -690,27 +680,17 @@ RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(StringRef Arch, bool EnableExperimentalExtension,
unsigned Major, Minor, ConsumeLength;
if (auto E = getExtensionVersion(Name, Vers, Major, Minor, ConsumeLength,
EnableExperimentalExtension,
- ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck)) {
- if (!IgnoreUnknown)
- return E;
-
- consumeError(std::move(E));
- if (Name.size() == 1)
- Ext = Ext.substr(ConsumeLength);
- continue;
- }
+ ExperimentalExtensionVersionCheck))
+ return E;
if (Name.size() == 1)
Ext = Ext.substr(ConsumeLength);
// Check if duplicated extension.
- if (!IgnoreUnknown && SeenExtMap.contains(Name.str()))
+ if (SeenExtMap.contains(Name.str()))
return createStringError(errc::invalid_argument,
"duplicated " + Desc + " '" + Name + "'");
- if (IgnoreUnknown && !RISCVISAInfo::isSupportedExtension(Name))
- continue;
-
SeenExtMap[Name.str()] = {Major, Minor};
} while (!Ext.empty());
}
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfoTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfoTest.cpp
index f944ac87b2cb0..eb5437b1ae3d4 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfoTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/TargetParser/RISCVISAInfoTest.cpp
@@ -341,25 +341,6 @@ TEST(ParseArchString, RejectsUnrecognizedExtensionNamesByDefault) {
"unsupported non-standard user-level extension 'xmadeup'");
}
-TEST(ParseArchString, IgnoresUnrecognizedExtensionNamesWithIgnoreUnknown) {
- for (StringRef Input : {"rv32i_zmadeup", "rv64i_smadeup", "rv64i_xmadeup"}) {
- auto MaybeISAInfo = RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(Input, true, false, true);
- ASSERT_THAT_EXPECTED(MaybeISAInfo, Succeeded());
- RISCVISAInfo &Info = **MaybeISAInfo;
- const auto &Exts = Info.getExtensions();
- EXPECT_EQ(Exts.size(), 1UL);
- EXPECT_TRUE(Exts.at("i") == (RISCVISAUtils::ExtensionVersion{2, 1}));
- }
-
- // Checks that supported extensions aren't incorrectly ignored when a
- // version is present (an early version of the patch had this mistake).
- auto MaybeISAInfo =
- RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString("rv32i_zbc1p0_xmadeup", true, false, true);
- ASSERT_THAT_EXPECTED(MaybeISAInfo, Succeeded());
- const auto &Exts = (*MaybeISAInfo)->getExtensions();
- EXPECT_TRUE(Exts.at("zbc") == (RISCVISAUtils::ExtensionVersion{1, 0}));
-}
-
TEST(ParseArchString, AcceptsVersionInLongOrShortForm) {
for (StringRef Input : {"rv64i2p1"}) {
auto MaybeISAInfo = RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(Input, true);
@@ -393,35 +374,6 @@ TEST(ParseArchString, RejectsUnrecognizedExtensionVersionsByDefault) {
"unsupported version number 10.10 for extension 'zifencei'");
}
-TEST(ParseArchString,
- UsesDefaultVersionForUnrecognisedBaseISAVersionWithIgnoreUnknown) {
- for (StringRef Input : {"rv32i0p1", "rv32i99p99", "rv64i0p1", "rv64i99p99"}) {
- auto MaybeISAInfo = RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(Input, true, false, true);
- ASSERT_THAT_EXPECTED(MaybeISAInfo, Succeeded());
- const auto &Exts = (*MaybeISAInfo)->getExtensions();
- EXPECT_EQ(Exts.size(), 1UL);
- EXPECT_TRUE(Exts.at("i") == (RISCVISAUtils::ExtensionVersion{2, 1}));
- }
- for (StringRef Input : {"rv32e0p1", "rv32e99p99", "rv64e0p1", "rv64e99p99"}) {
- auto MaybeISAInfo = RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(Input, true, false, true);
- ASSERT_THAT_EXPECTED(MaybeISAInfo, Succeeded());
- const auto &Exts = (*MaybeISAInfo)->getExtensions();
- EXPECT_EQ(Exts.size(), 1UL);
- EXPECT_TRUE(Exts.at("e") == (RISCVISAUtils::ExtensionVersion{2, 0}));
- }
-}
-
-TEST(ParseArchString,
- IgnoresExtensionsWithUnrecognizedVersionsWithIgnoreUnknown) {
- for (StringRef Input : {"rv32im1p1", "rv64i_svnapot10p9", "rv32i_zicsr0p5"}) {
- auto MaybeISAInfo = RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(Input, true, false, true);
- ASSERT_THAT_EXPECTED(MaybeISAInfo, Succeeded());
- const auto &Exts = (*MaybeISAInfo)->getExtensions();
- EXPECT_EQ(Exts.size(), 1UL);
- EXPECT_TRUE(Exts.at("i") == (RISCVISAUtils::ExtensionVersion{2, 1}));
- }
-}
-
TEST(ParseArchString, AcceptsUnderscoreSplittingExtensions) {
for (StringRef Input : {"rv32imafdczifencei", "rv32i_m_a_f_d_c_zifencei"}) {
auto MaybeISAInfo = RISCVISAInfo::parseArchString(Input, true);
|
Isn't this functionality needed for things like llvm-objdump?.. |
llvm-objdump uses parseNormalizedArchString |
Some digs into the history:
So it seems we don't need |
…m#97372) This isn't used in tree, and thus I don't know what the expectations for its behavior really are. The original usage of this feature has been replaced by parseNormalizedArchString.
…m#97372) This isn't used in tree, and thus I don't know what the expectations for its behavior really are. The original usage of this feature has been replaced by parseNormalizedArchString.
This isn't used in tree, and thus I don't know what the expectations for its behavior really are.